NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1041387
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2014-Mar
Pages: 7
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0047-231X
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
Examinations That Support Collaborative Learning: The Students' Perspective
Rieger, Georg W.; Heiner, Cynthia E.
Journal of College Science Teaching, v43 n4 p41-47 Mar 2014
We used surveys and classroom observations to examine student reactions to two-stage exams, where students first do the exam individually and then redo it collaboratively. Our results show why both students and instructors appreciate this examination format: Two-stage collaborative examinations are relatively easy to implement, have a high potential for learning, and support the collaborative learning approach used in many sciences classes. A look at survey data from an introductory physics class shows that a vast majority of students (76%) had a positive opinion of this exam format (expressed in 236 comments) whereas only 10% expressed an overall negative opinion in 30 negative statements. Most of the positive comments relate to how this benefits learning. In this article, we describe how to implement two-stage exams, discuss advantages and disadvantages, and present the students' view.
National Science Teachers Association. 1840 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22201-3000. Tel: 800-722-6782; Fax: 703-243-3924; e-mail: membership@nsta.org; Web site: http://www.nsta.org
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: Canada
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A