ERIC Number: EJ1032979
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2014-Mar
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 10
A Century-Old Question: Does a Crookes Paddle Wheel Cathode Ray Tube Demonstrate That Electrons Carry Momentum?
Humphrey, T. E.; Calisa, Vaishnavi
Physics Teacher, v52 n3 p142-145 Mar 2014
In 1879, in the midst of the debate between English and continental scientists about the nature of cathode rays, William Crookes conducted an experiment in which a small mill or "paddle wheel" was pushed along tracks inside a cathode ray tube (CRT) (similar to that shown in Fig. 1) when connected to a high-voltage induction coil. Crookes attributed the motion of the wheel to momentum transfer from the cathode rays (electrons) to the wheel, and interpreted the experiment as providing evidence that cathode rays were particles. In 1903 Thomson discounted Crookes' interpretation by calculating that the rate of momentum transfer (which he estimated at no more than 2×10[superscript -3] dyn, equivalent to 2×10[superscript -8] N) would be far too small to account for the observed motion of the wheel, instead attributing the motion to the radiometric effect. The misconception was not laid to rest, however, and despite an effort in 1961 to draw attention to Thomson's original work and so remove the error from textbooks, the notion that a Crookes paddle wheel CRT demonstrates that electrons carry momentum continues to be taught in high school physics courses and wheel. We then measured the actual acceleration of the wheel in the CRT by video analysis of its motion and determined the moment of inertia of the wheel along with its mass and dimensions. We could then compare the force, which really acts on the wheel to produce the observed motion to the maximum impulsive force that is supplied by the electrons. Our measurements yield a maximum impulsive force due to the electrons [F[subscript el] = (1.1 ± 0.3) × 10[superscript -8]N], which is within a factor of two of Thomson's estimate, and which is more than two orders of magnitude smaller than the force that is responsible for the observed acceleration of the paddle wheel [F[subscript W] = (6 ± 2) × 10[superscript -6]N]. This means that the rotation of the wheel is certainly not due to transferred momentum from the electron beam, and the results of the experiment should not be taught to students as proof that electrons are particles with mass that carry momentum.
Descriptors: Demonstrations (Educational), Motion, Scientific Concepts, Mechanics (Physics), Measurement Techniques, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation, Science Experiments, Replication (Evaluation), Secondary School Science, Kinetics, Misconceptions, Mathematical Applications, Intellectual History, Science Equipment
American Association of Physics Teachers. One Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740. Tel: 301-209-3300; Fax: 301-209-0845; e-mail: email@example.com; Web site: http://scitation.aip.org/tpt
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Secondary Education; High Schools
Authoring Institution: N/A