NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1023710
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2013
Pages: 4
Abstractor: ERIC
ISSN: ISSN-1536-6367
The Meaning of Goodness-of-Fit Tests: Commentary on "Goodness-of-Fit Assessment of Item Response Theory Models"
Thissen, David
Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, v11 n3 p123-126 2013
In this commentary, David Thissen states that "Goodness-of-fit assessment for IRT models is maturing; it has come a long way from zero." Thissen then references prior works on "goodness of fit" in the index of Lord and Novick's (1968) classic text; Yen (1984); Drasgow, Levine, Tsien, Williams, and Mead (1995); Chen and Thissen (1997); and Reiser (1996). Thissen adds that Maydeu-Olivares and his colleagues have made the most significant contributions to goodness-of-fit testing for IRT models for the past decade, thus, Maydeu-Olivares is uniquely qualified to write the focus article, which consists largely of a clear exposition of unassailable facts. This commentary takes a step back, considering the usefulness and meaning of overall goodness of fit tests for IRT.
Psychology Press. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site:
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Opinion Papers; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A