NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
ERIC Number: ED566838
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2015
Pages: 109
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: N/A
ISBN: 978-1-3394-8619-2
ISSN: N/A
Tweet vs. Status Update: Exploring Ways to Promote Collaborative Argumentation in an Online Classroom Setting
Owens, Marissa Christina
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
The focus of this study was to answer the following overarching question: How does a Twitter discussion format compare to a Facebook discussion format in terms of promoting collaborative argumentative discourse? Data analysis focused on the difference in amount of arguments, counter-arguments, reasons, and elaborations generated by participants between the two social media platforms. In addition, the impact of participant use of sentence openers on the amount of argument components was also examined. A Mann-Whitney statistical test was conducted to determine the differences between Twitter and Facebook groups in argument components across three small group discussion questions. The results of the test revealed there was a significant difference in the amount of argument components per discussion between Twitter and Facebook groups, with the Facebook groups including more argument components within their discourse. In addition, 15 participants were provided with a list of sentence openers. A content analysis was conducted on 319 tweets/postings. Although zero participants utilized the list, of the 15 participants provided sentence openers, 7 used variations (47%), with 5 in Facebook groups. Of the 12 participants not provided sentence openers, 4 used variations (33%), with 2 in Facebook groups. There was a small qualitative trend for the sentence opener groups to use variations, especially the Facebook participants. Based on these results, Facebook was identified as a viable tool to promote collaborative argumentation within an online discussion. What the results of this study determined is that the use of Facebook could be effectively incorporated into a full-semester online course. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A