ERIC Number: ED562632
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 1996
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 19
Differences in Strategies Used to Solve STEM-Equivalent Constructed-Response and Multiple-Choice SAT®-Mathematics Items. Report No. 95-3. ETS RR No. 96-20
Katz, Irvin R.; Friedman, Debra E.; Bennett, Randy Elliot; Berger, Aliza E.
College Entrance Examination Board
This study investigated the strategies subjects adopted to solve STEM-equivalent SAT-Mathematics (SAT-M) word problems in constructed-response (CR) and multiple-choice (MC) formats. Parallel test forms of CR and MC items were administered to subjects representing a range of mathematical abilities. Format-related differences in difficulty were more prominent at the item level than for the test as a whole. At the item level, analyses of subjects' problem-solving processes appeared to explain differences as well as similarities. Although there may be good reasons for using constructed-response items in large-scale testing programs, multiple-choice questions of the sort studied here should provide measurement that is generally comparable to stem-equivalent constructed-response items. An appendix presents "Item Stems and Multiple-Choice Options for Each Item Pair."
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, College Entrance Examinations, Problem Solving, Cognitive Style, STEM Education, Word Problems (Mathematics), Test Format, Test Items, Mathematical Aptitude, Difficulty Level, High School Students, Learning Strategies
College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: email@example.com; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org
Publication Type: Reports - Research; Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education; High Schools; Secondary Education
Authoring Institution: College Entrance Examination Board; Educational Testing Service
Identifiers - Location: New Jersey
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: SAT (College Admission Test)