ERIC Number: ED558760
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2015-Jan
Reference Count: 7
Optimizing Reverse Transfer Policies and Processes: Lessons from Twelve CWID States. Thought Paper
Taylor, Jason L.; Bragg, Debra D.
Office of Community College Research and Leadership
In 2012, five foundations launched the Credit When Its Due (CWID) initiative that was "designed to encourage partnerships of community colleges and universities to significantly expand programs that award associate degrees to transfer students when the student completes the requirements for the associate degree while pursuing a bachelor's degree" (Lumina Foundation, 2012, n.p.), also known as "reverse transfer." Initially, 12 states (Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, and Oregon) were funded to develop and implement these reverse transfer programs and policies, and the Office of Community College Research and Leadership (OCCRL) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign was chosen as the research partner. In late 2013, three states (Georgia, Tennessee, and Texas) were added to bring the total number of states to 15. At least six additional states have legislation, pending legislation, or statewide initiatives related to reverse transfer. This thought paper describes changes that are occurring at the state, system, and institution levels with implementation of reverse transfer in the 12 original states. Using qualitative and quantitative data collected from the CWID Implementation Study, the authors describe efforts related to the optimization of reverse transfer in these 12 states. The authors define optimization as policy and program change at any level--state, system, or institution--that yields the largest number of students who are eligible for and able to benefit from reverse transfer. The initial results suggest that some states are piloting reverse transfer with a limited set of public community college and university partnerships, and others are striving for system-level reforms that eventually may impact all forms of transfer. Understanding what optimization means and how it works is possible because of this variation in implementation approaches among states, and this thought paper explores how states are implementing and optimizing reverse transfer.
Descriptors: Transfer Programs, Transfer Policy, College Transfer Students, Associate Degrees, Bachelors Degrees, Partnerships in Education, State Legislation, Program Implementation, Educational Change, Eligibility, Identification, State Policy, Student Participation, Informed Consent, Academic Records, Audits (Verification), Academic Advising
Office of Community College Research and Leadership. 51 Gerty Drive Room 129, Champaign, IL 61820. Tel: 217-244-9390; Fax: 217-244-0851; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; Web site: http://occrl.illinois.edu
Publication Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education; Two Year Colleges
Sponsor: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Lumina Foundation
Authoring Institution: Illinois University, Office of Community College Research and Leadership
Identifiers - Location: Arkansas; Colorado; Florida; Georgia; Hawaii; Maryland; Michigan; Minnesota; Missouri; New York; North Carolina; Ohio; Oregon; Tennessee; Texas