NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
ERIC Number: ED536719
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2011
Pages: 116
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: N/A
ISBN: ISBN-978-1-2670-8296-1
A Multi-Institutional Investigation into Cheating on Tests in College Online Courses
Dille, Edith Turner
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of South Carolina
Cheating in classes is not a new concern for higher education faculty. It has been studied extensively during the last 50 years by researchers such as Bowers, Cizek, McCabe, Passow, and Whitley. However, most of the research on cheating to date has been related to traditional courses and has often included a wide range of cheating types. With the explosion of online learning in the last 15 years, there has been very little research related to cheating on tests in online classes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to learn more about cheating among students taking online classes in two-year and four-year educational institutions in the United States. This study used Ajzen's (1991) theory of planned behavior as the conceptual framework to investigate students' attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control as it related to cheating on unproctored tests in online courses. As suggested by Brown and Emmett (2001), moral obligation was also added to the predictors. An online survey sent to 5 two-year and 5 four-year colleges was used to obtain student self-report data for the study. Perceived behavioral control and moral obligation were both found to be significant predictors of cheating on tests in online courses. The findings included no significant difference between students cheating on online tests in private versus public colleges or two-year versus four-year colleges. The only significant demographic factor appeared to be age group, with students in the younger age group admitting to cheating more often. A larger percentage (18.4 percent) admitted to cheating on tests in traditional courses than in online courses (15.5 percent). However, the odds were that students who admitted cheating on tests in traditional classes were 7.26 times as likely to admit to cheating on tests in online classes. This finding indicates that cheaters cheat regardless of the instructional mode. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page:]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site:
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education; Two Year Colleges
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: United States