NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
ERIC Number: ED516806
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2010
Pages: 120
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: N/A
ISBN: ISBN-978-1-1240-1419-7
ISSN: N/A
Learning and Study Strategies of Baccalaureate Nursing Students during First Semester Nursing Courses
Gatto, Susan L.
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Background. Attrition rates from nursing courses and programs are reported to range from 3 to 55 percent with 20 to 80 percent due to involuntary attrition (academic failure). While trying to address the nursing shortage, nursing programs increased enrollment, but did not produce enough graduates since involuntary attrition also increased. While previous research indicates that learning and study strategies are related to academic performance, research that helps to explain baccalaureate nursing students' risks were lacking. Purpose. The purpose was to identify the learning and study strategies and learner characteristics of baccalaureate nursing students with and without academic risk during first semester nursing courses. Methods. This study used a descriptive, causal-comparative, research design. The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) (2nd ed.) measured the students' awareness and use of learning and study strategies. A questionnaire was developed to determine academic performance and learner characteristics from students at two baccalaureate nursing programs in a southern state. Results. The 133 participants were mostly female (84%), NonHispanic White (81%), and ESL (5%). Age M=23.35 years (SD = 5.770; range 19-49 years), GPA M=3.538 (SD = 0.2746), and transfer credit hours M=24.41 (SD = 35.610; range 0-240). Logistic regression analysis found the model fit questionable (-2 log likelihood of 150.854 compared with the initial -2 log likelihood of 181.048). The variance was low (Cox & Snell R[superscript 2] = 0.203, Nagelkerke R[superscript 2] = 0.273). The model correctly classified 70.7 percent of the participants, but that was only a 12.7 percent improvement over "chance" classification. A "t"-test for independent groups revealed significant (p less than 0.05) differences between the LASSI subscales: anxiety (t (131)=2.941, p=0.004), concentration (t (131)=2.663, p=0.009), selecting main idea (t (131)=2.760, p=0.007), and testing strategies (t (131)=3.462, p=0.001) of students with and without academic risk. Discussion. Contrary to other studies, in this study, age, number of transfer credits, and learning and study strategies did not predict being academically at-risk. A higher grade point average lowered the odds of being academically at-risk while being of a minority race and ESL increased the risk. The academically at-risk students were anxious, lacked concentration, could not select the main idea, and did not effectively use testing strategies. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Higher Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: Learning and Study Strategies Inventory