NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
ERIC Number: ED504880
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2005
Pages: 188
Abstractor: ERIC
Reference Count: N/A
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
Tracking Progress, Engaging Communities: Abbott Indicators Technical Report--Trenton, New Jersey
Hirsch, Lesley; Applewhite-Coney, Erain
Education Law Center
Trenton is one of 31 urban school districts in New Jersey known as Abbott districts. As an Abbott district, Trenton receives funding to equalize its per student general education budget with the most successful suburban districts in the state. Through a series of indicators, the Trenton Abbott Indicators Report presents the status of educational reforms and student progress. The report is intended to: (1) Inform people in Trenton about the status of school improvement efforts and student outcomes; (2) Engage stakeholders in exploring and discussing what is working and what still remains to be done; (3) Develop and put into action a plan to support school improvement; and (4) Establish a system of accountability practices that can be used for years to come. Reported findings are organized by Abbott remedy: preschool, K-12 education, and school facilities construction, presented with accompanying tables and discussion. (Contains 46 endnotes and 86 figures.) [Additional project funding was supplied by the Victoria Foundation. For summary report, see ED504890.]
Education Law Center. 60 Park Place Suite 300, Newark, NJ 07102. Tel: 973-624-1815; Fax: 973-624-7339; e-mail: elc@edlawcenter.org, Web site: http://www.edlawcenter.org
Publication Type: Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: Rockefeller Foundation, New York, NY.; Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, Morristown, NJ.; Prudential Foundation, Newark, NJ.; William Penn Foundation; Fund for New Jersey, East Orange.
Authoring Institution: Education Law Center, Inc., Newark, NJ.
Identifiers - Location: New Jersey
Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs: Abbott v Burke