NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
ERIC Number: ED496450
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2005
Pages: 4
Abstractor: ERIC
ISSN: ISSN-1068-1027
Is Intergenerational Equity Inequitably Conservative?
Riggs, Henry; Warner, Timothy
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, Trusteeship v13 n4 Jul-Aug 2005
The academic community has developed widespread consensus that trustees must balance two competing "goods" when managing their institution's endowment: first, support of current operations--preferably in a manner that dampens year-to-year volatility--and second, preservation of the endowment to serve future generations. That is to say, trustees are challenged to achieve what is called intergenerational equity. Typically, donors of endowment funds to support particular programs are assured that their gifts will benefit those programs "in perpetuity", and institutions set aside these endowment gifts in specifically earmarked funds within the total endowment. In this article, the authors pose the question of whether "in perpetuity" promises are sensible, given the current pace of change in society and in research and teaching interests. They contend that trustees who subscribe to the total-return concept of managing endowments may be shortchanging the current generation of students.
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. 1133 20th Street NW Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 800-356-6317; Tel: 202-296-8400; Fax: 202-223-7053; Web site:
Publication Type: Guides - Non-Classroom
Education Level: Higher Education
Audience: Administrators
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, Washington, DC.
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A