NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
ERIC Number: ED258235
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 1985-Aug
Pages: 38
Abstractor: N/A
Reference Count: N/A
Readers' Response to Appearance of Competing Metropolitan Dailies.
Pasternack, Steve; Utt, Sandra H.
A study was conducted to examine newspaper readers' responses to front page design and to explore the perceived differences among traditional, modern, and modular formats of newspaper design. Slides of the front pages of 10 pairs of competing daily newspapers were shown to 91 journalism students. After viewing three slides for each paper, subjects completed a semantic differential instrument for each one. Students also indicated how attractive they found nine appearance devices for the newspapers and completed a profile questionnaire. Respondents generally gave moderate to good ratings to most newspapers on most dimensions. Only one of the pairs of papers showed a significant difference on any of the 15 quality ratings. The "Evening Sun," Baltimore's circulation leader, was perceived as much bolder than the competing "News American." Modular papers, although perceived as bolder, more modern, and more readable, were also viewed as less professional and as containing softer news. Traditional papers were seen as more valuable, more accurate, and running harder news, but also as old fashioned and more dull. Newspapers using the modern format scored higher across the 15-item quality dimension, with the "Detroit News" scoring highest in overall quality. Subjects who read newspapers regularly were more likely to find the use of graphs and charts attractive than were nonregular readers. (HTH)
Publication Type: Speeches/Meeting Papers; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A