|
|
Pub Date: |
2003-03-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Opinion Papers |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Employed Parents; Family Work Relationship; Leaves of Absence; Parents; Public Policy; Retirement Benefits; Tax Credits; Unemployment Insurance
Abstract:
Although the Family and Medical Leave Act enabled some parents to take unpaid parental leave in order to fulfill family responsibilities, it did not cover all workers and did not provide workers the financial support to do so. This policy report calls for Congress to: require states to allow new parents who have been working to collect unemployment insurance; extend the Family and Medical Leave Act to cover all establishments with greater than 25 workers; expand the child tax credit to $2,000 for parents with children under the age of 1 year, when one parent is staying home with the child; and allow parents who take off work during the first 3 years of their childs life to later make up the tax free retirement contributions they missed. The report discusses the benefits of establishing strong parental bonds with infants, the decline in the number of stay-at-home parents, and parental leave policies in other nations. Three components of a national policy are then presented as a way to help parents stay home with their newborns for at least 6 months: boosting child tax credits, making up lost tax-free retirement contributions, and replacing a portion of income for stay-at-home parents. The report considers two arguments against parental paid leave related to its unfairness to individuals without children and contentions that the policy will hurt business. The policy report concludes by asserting that a change in national policy will benefit families and the nation. (Contains 42 endnotes.) (KB)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (220K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2002-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Adjustment (to Environment); Change Strategies; Comparative Analysis; Delivery Systems; Dislocated Workers; Economically Disadvantaged; Eligibility; Employment Programs; Employment Services; Federal Legislation; Federal State Relationship; Health Care Costs; Job Placement; Job Training; Policy Formation; Program Costs; Public Policy; Retraining; State Programs; State Regulation; Trend Analysis; Unemployment Insurance; Vocational Rehabilitation; Welfare Reform; Workers Compensation
Abstract:
Income replacement and reemployment programs in Michigan and its neighboring states were examined in the context of recent changes in federal policy regarding compensation and services for individuals who have lost their jobs or sustained job-related injuries. The analysis focused primarily on the following programs: (1) Unemployment Insurance (UI); (2) Workers' Compensation (WC); and (3) the cluster of reemployment and training programs that, since 1998, have come under the Workforce Investment Act. The analysis established that UI, Michigan Works!, and WC are unique among Michigan's programs because they replace lost earnings and deliver services to workers on a regular basis, whereas other programs intended to improve workers' well-being do so solely through regulation. UI and Michigan Works! are all becoming increasing contentious in the wake of welfare reform and the first recession in a decade. Although WC has been relatively free of controversy during the past decade, it, too, may be under increasing pressure as medical costs resume their rise. Despite the recent arguments regarding the generosity of their benefits and the appropriate extent of training for disadvantaged workers, UI, Michigan Works!, and WC have all gained widespread acceptance as essential to efficient funding of the labor market. (Thirteen figures/tables are included. The bibliography lists 57 references.) (MN)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2002-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Opinion Papers; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Access to Health Care; Adjustment (to Environment); Child Care; Employment Practices; Family Health; Family Work Relationship; Government Role; Health Insurance; Income; Job Security; Policy Formation; Population Trends; Public Policy; Retirement Benefits; Social Science Research; Unemployment Insurance; Wellness; Work Environment; Working Poor
Abstract:
This document contains two papers on connections between work and health and policy options for improving the health of working families. "Foreword" (James A. Auerbach) places the two papers in the context of recent research on the connections between work, family, and health. Chapter 1's overview addresses the changing nature of work, the new economy, and recent demographic trends. Chapter 2: The Impact of Work on Employees and Family Health examines the health effects of job security, income, work organization, health and pension benefits, work schedules, workplace stress, occupational health, socioeconomic status across the life course, and family and sick leave. Chapter 3: Policy Options outlines these three strategies: (1) focus on the individual and the job; (2) encourage the business sector to adopt supportive policies; and (3) develop and expand government policy. "Further Implications for Policy" (James A. Auerbach) weighs the effectiveness of work-life programs, family medical leave and paid leave, unemployment insurance, and childcare and elder care in improving the balance between work, family, and health. He concludes by urging policymakers to adopt policies based on the following principles: work redesign; paid leave and family care; reduced hours and flexibility; women in leadership positions, worker voice, community empowerment; and work-family councils. (MN)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (903K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2002-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Collected Works - Proceedings; Books; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Client Characteristics (Human Services); Counseling Services; Decision Making; Delivery Systems; Dislocated Workers; Educational Demand; Employment Services; Evaluation Methods; Federal Legislation; Futures (of Society); Job Placement; Job Skills; Labor Force Development; Labor Turnover; Measurement Techniques; Organizational Objectives; Outreach Programs; Performance Factors; Policy Formation; Prediction; Profiles; Program Evaluation; Public Agencies; Public Policy; Reentry Workers; Self Employment; Skill Development; State Action; Statewide Planning; Statistical Analysis; Systems Approach; Training; Trend Analysis; Underemployment; Unemployment; Unemployment Insurance; Welfare Recipients; Welfare Reform
Abstract:
This document contains 13 papers on targeting employment services. The following papers are included: "Targeting Employment Services under the Workforce Investment Act" (Stephen A. Wandner); "Predicting the Exhaustion of Unemployment Compensation" (Robert B. Olsen, Marisa Kelso, Paul T. Decker, Daniel H. Klepinger); "Evaluation of WPRS (Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services) Systems" (Katherine P. Dickinson, Paul T. Decker, Suzanne D. Kreutzer); "A Panel Discussion on the WPRS System" (Pete Fleming, Al Jaloviar, Helen Parker, Marc Perrett); "Profiling in Self-Employment Assistance Programs" (Jon C. Messenger, Carolyn Perterson-Vaccaro, Wayne Vroman); "Targeting Reemployment Bonuses" (Christopher J. O'Leary, Paul T. Decker, Stephen A. Wandner); "Measures of Program Performance and the Training Choices of Displaced Workers" (Louis Jacobson, Robert LaLonde, Daniel Sullivan); "Using Statistical Assessment Tools to Target Services to Work First Participants" (Randall W. Eberts); "Targeting Job Retention Services for Welfare Recipients" (Anu Rangarajan, Peter Schochet, Dexter Chu); "Targeting Reemployment Services in Canada: The Service and Outcome Measurement System (SMOS) Experience" (Terry Colpitts); "Predicting Long-Term Unemployment in Canada" (Ging Wong, Harold Henson, Arun Roy); "A Frontline Decision Support System for One-Stop Centers" (Randall W. Eberts, Christopher J. O'Leary, Kelly J. DeRango); and "A Panel Discussion of the Experience and Future Plans of States" (Rich Hobbie, Jim Finch, Chuck Middlebrooks, Jack Weidenbach). Several papers include substantial bibliographies. Most papers include one or more comments written by various individuals. (MN)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|