|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Teaching Methods; Industry; Instructional Innovation; Technology Education; Standards; Vignettes; Problem Solving; High Schools; High School Students; Secondary School Teachers
Abstract:
Innovation is central to modern industry. It can and should be taught in schools. Not only does providing students a background in innovation benefit them later in life and industry, but it also promotes and further develops their critical thinking and collaboration skills. Despite the need for innovation, many have struggled with how to teach it. Typically, this is a result of thinking about innovation too linearly. In innovation, there typically is no single right answer, and there isn't a defined path leading towards a perfect solution. Rather, innovation is a nonlinear development of ideas where the ingredients of finding, shaping, playing, refining, and sharing are used interchangeably to develop innovative products, systems, or services. This article provides a brief fictional vignette, drawn from the authors' experiences teaching innovation to students, of specific methods a teacher could use to incorporate innovation into his or her classroom. (Contains 1 table, 3 images and 1 graphic.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Rohr, Samuel L. |
Source: |
Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, v14 n2 p195-208 2012-2013 |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Liberal Arts; Grade Point Average; Enrollment; Predictor Variables; College Entrance Examinations; Undergraduate Students; Prediction; Academic Persistence; School Holding Power; College Preparation; School Size; Small Schools; Regression (Statistics); Engineering Education; Mathematics Education; STEM Education; Science Education; Technology Education; Business Administration Education; Correlation
Abstract:
This study examined the relationship between various admissions selection criteria utilized by a small, Liberal Arts College in Indiana. More specifically, the study examined if a higher college preparatory GPA and a higher aggregate score on the SAT helped predict the retention of science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and business students. Data was gathered using historical enrollment data of 803 students. A logistic regression analysis was utilized to examine the impact of the two variables on retention of science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and business students. College preparatory GPA and the aggregate SAT score were predictors of retention of science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and business students. For every point increase in GPA, the odds were more than twice as much that the student would be retained. For every point increase in SAT, there was 0.3% increase in retention. (Contains 6 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-01-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Student Attitudes; Content Analysis; Homework; Qualitative Research; Grade 7; Grade 8; Preferences; Educational Attitudes; Access to Information; Science Education; Technology Education; Questionnaires; Learning Activities; Science Activities; Difficulty Level; Performance Factors; Barriers; Foreign Countries
Abstract:
This study has been created as a qualitative search related the given homeworks in the science and technology courses in order to examine the students' views. The sample consists of 1,539 7th- and 8th- grade students in the city centre of Osmaniye. The search data is obtained from by using five open-ended questions. In the analysis of the data, content analysis method is used. As a result of the research, it is found that the students' perceptions for the homeworks are about understanding the subjects better, as reviews, responsibilities, homeworks to be done at home and doing researches. Also, it is concluded that there is a difference between the type of the homeworks given to the students and the homeworks which the students prefer doing. It is found that the students have difficulty in reaching the information from the resources, providing the tools, doing the hard homeworks, and doing the homeworks without understanding the subject. Finally, it is concluded that by these homeworks, the students understand the subject better, develop their skills (hand, research, observation, experiment, reading, and writing skills), get information about the natural events and living beings, solve tests in a shorter time, and get information about current events. (Contains 5 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (122K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Author(s): |
Potter, Patricia |
Source: |
International Journal of Technology and Design Education, v23 n1 p69-85 Feb 2013 |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-02-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Feedback (Response); Technology Education; Problem Solving; Communities of Practice; Semi Structured Interviews; Research Projects; Engineering; Technical Occupations; Design
Abstract:
Design and problem-solving is a key learning focus in technology education and remains a distinguishing factor that separates it from other subject areas. This research investigated how two expert designers considered experiences with hard materials contributed to their learning design and problem-solving with these materials. The research project used a qualitative approach and conducted semi-structured interviews with two mechanical engineers. They identified their experiences under three key headings that provided them with much of the essential knowledge and understanding they employ today to design and problem-solve with hard materials. These included experience of seeing outcomes that provided feedback on their designs, experiences that informed about materials and material selection and accessing others' experiences from communities of practice.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|