|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Foreign Countries; Feedback (Response); Scripts; Student Certification; Examiners; Teaching Methods; Grading; Leaders; Behavior; Inspection; Decision Making; Chemistry; Geography; Critical Thinking; Secondary Education
Abstract:
UK awarding bodies increasingly use technology to distribute digital copies of students' examination scripts to examiners for marking. This process allows senior examiners (team leaders) to remotely monitor and feedback on the marking quality of examiners under their supervision throughout the marking period. The objective of this study was to gain an overview of team leader monitoring behaviours in the context of ongoing, situated decision making. This overview included specific analysis of the types of feedback behaviours employed by team leaders as well as the motivations behind their use. A second objective was to gain an understanding of the effects of any feedback on recipient examiners. The study identified that all team leaders proceeded through three distinct stages of monitoring. The study was also able to identify some variation in behaviours between the different team leaders, particularly in the extent to which feedback was dialogic in character, and this had apparent effects on the examiners who received the feedback. (Contains 1 table and 7 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Fitzpatrick, Katie |
Source: |
Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, v2 n3-4 p35-51 2011 |
|
Pub Date: |
2011-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Foreign Countries; High School Students; Physical Education; Ethnicity; Social Class; Low Achievement; Minority Group Students; Health Education; Standards; Educational Environment; Academic Achievement; Educational Testing; Pacific Islanders; Ethnic Groups; Credentials; Student Certification; Migrant Children; Course Selection (Students); Status
Abstract:
Health and physical education (PE) are low status, marginalised subjects in many schools internationally. However in New Zealand, Australia and elsewhere, they are concurrently credentialed and recognised senior high school options in which students can gain national qualifications. In New Zealand these subjects also tend to attract students who are statistically low achievers in the educational system. For example, health and PE are chosen in senior high school by disproportionate numbers of Maori (indigenous) and migrant Pasifika youth. Results suggest that these same youth achieve more in these disciplines than in other subjects. Considering why large numbers of Maori and Pasifika students choose health and PE is, of course, important. More prescient perhaps is consideration of how their engagement with health and PE intersects with their general positioning in education in relation to social class, ethnicity, physicality and other social hierarchies. Of interest is whether achievement in health and PE reinforces or contests the underachievement of Maori and Pasifika students? In this article, I discuss the implications for marginalised youth in taking health and PE as senior high school options. I draw on Bourdieu's notion of capital to explore the intersection of ethnicity, health and PE with national qualifications. (Contains 2 notes and 1 table.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Adedoyin, O. O. |
Source: |
Educational Research and Reviews, v5 n7 p385-399 Jul 2010 |
|
Pub Date: |
2010-07-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Test Items; Foreign Countries; Statistical Analysis; Gender Bias; Item Response Theory; Mathematics Tests; Case Studies; Comparative Analysis; Item Analysis; Student Certification; Statistical Bias; Measurement Techniques
Abstract:
This is a quantitative study, which attempted to detect gender bias test items from the Botswana Junior Certificate Examination in mathematics. To detect gender bias test items, a randomly selected sample of 4000 students responses to mathematics paper 1 of the Botswana Junior Certificate examination were selected from 36,000 students who sat for the examination. Out of which 2,000 were males and 2000 were females. The examination paper consisted of 38 test items. To detect the gender biased test items, the study used 3PL (Multilog software) item response theory (IRT) statistical analysis. This generated the item characteristics curves (ICC for the two groups (male/female). The study compared the results generated from the ICC curves for the male and female groups, and found that, out of 16 test items that fitted the 3PL item response theory (IRT) statistical analysis, 5 items were gender biased. (Contains 3 tables and 7 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Calveric, Sarah B. |
Source: |
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University |
|
Pub Date: |
2010-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Student Certification; Teacher Attitudes; Student Evaluation; Evaluation Methods; Surveys; Elementary School Teachers; Beliefs; Accountability; Teacher Evaluation; Correlation; Teacher Improvement; Teacher Education; Educational Attainment
Abstract:
Increased state and federal accountability measures have made the assessment of student performance one of the most critical responsibilities of classroom teachers; yet, inadequate opportunities for preservice and inservice training leave many teachers feeling ill-prepared for this task. Adding to the complexity of building teachers' assessment literacy is the relationship between assessment beliefs and classroom assessment practices. This quantitative study utilizes a validated, online survey to examine how elementary teachers (n = 79) define their assessment beliefs (conceptions) and how these beliefs influence which assessment practices are valued within the classroom. Findings suggest that despite teachers' limited exposure to assessment training, four distinct assessment beliefs exist within the elementary classroom: assessment for school accountability, assessment for student certification, assessment for improvement of teaching and learning, and assessment as irrelevant. Assessment for the improvement of teaching and learning yielded the highest composite mean and was negatively correlated with the irrelevance belief and positively related to school accountability. An analysis of the importance of assessment practices revealed authentic assessments, short answers, teacher-made assessments, and performance assessments as the most valued, while publisher assessments and major exams had the lowest means. Significant relationships were identified between demographics and beliefs and practices, with the most practical findings related to exposure to assessment training and level of degree attainment. Significant relationships were also noted between all beliefs and the value of specific assessment practices, with the exception of the irrelevance belief. No significant relationships were noted between the irrelevant belief and value of assessment practices; however, many negative correlations were documented. Results are discussed in light of other research, indicating that a greater understanding of assessment beliefs and importance of practices can contribute to the development of relevant professional development aimed at the improvement of teachers' assessment pedagogies and practices can contribute to greater educational success. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|