Author(s): |
Rohr, Samuel L. |
Source: |
Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, v14 n2 p195-208 2012-2013 |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Liberal Arts; Grade Point Average; Enrollment; Predictor Variables; College Entrance Examinations; Undergraduate Students; Prediction; Academic Persistence; School Holding Power; College Preparation; School Size; Small Schools; Regression (Statistics); Engineering Education; Mathematics Education; STEM Education; Science Education; Technology Education; Business Administration Education; Correlation
Abstract:
This study examined the relationship between various admissions selection criteria utilized by a small, Liberal Arts College in Indiana. More specifically, the study examined if a higher college preparatory GPA and a higher aggregate score on the SAT helped predict the retention of science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and business students. Data was gathered using historical enrollment data of 803 students. A logistic regression analysis was utilized to examine the impact of the two variables on retention of science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and business students. College preparatory GPA and the aggregate SAT score were predictors of retention of science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and business students. For every point increase in GPA, the odds were more than twice as much that the student would be retained. For every point increase in SAT, there was 0.3% increase in retention. (Contains 6 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Phillippo, Kate |
Source: |
Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education, v44 n4 p441-467 Nov 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-11-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Urban Schools; School Districts; Teacher Student Relationship; Educational Policy; Qualitative Research; Student Reaction; Trust (Psychology); Privacy; Small Schools; High Schools; Student Empowerment; Sociocultural Patterns; Student School Relationship; High School Students; Low Income Groups; Minority Groups
Abstract:
Urban school districts have increasingly enacted policies of personalism, such as converting large schools into smaller schools. Such policies ask teachers to develop supportive, individual relationships with students as a presumed lever for student achievement. Research on student-teacher relationships generally supports policies of personalism. Much of this literature also considers these relationships' sociocultural dimensions, and so leads to questions about how low-income youth and youth of color might respond to teacher efforts to develop closer relationships with them. This qualitative study, conducted over 1 year with 34 youth at 3 small, urban high schools, explores how youth from nondominant groups responded to teacher personalism. Data show that teacher practices consistent with culturally-responsive pedagogy and relational trust literature do promote student-teacher relationships. However, tensions arose when participants perceived that teacher personalism threatened their privacy or agency. Sociocultural and institutional contexts contributed to these tensions, as participants navigated personalism amidst experiences that constrained their trust in schools. A staged model of student-teacher relationships integrates these findings and extends current thinking about culturally-responsive personalism. These findings inform implications for teacher practice and policies of personalism.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Opinion Papers |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Academic Achievement; Evidence; Standardized Tests; School Size; Poverty; Small Schools; Financial Support; School Districts; Educational Policy; Policy Formation; Underachievement; Correlation
Abstract:
Without a doubt, poverty has a negative influence on student achievement, especially when achievement is measured by state-mandated standardized tests. However, some bureaucrats, such as state commissioners of education and even state governors, continue to downplay the influence of poverty on student achievement. New Jersey's Governor Chris Christie recently pronounced that providing monetary aid to the state's struggling districts, the poorest communities in the state, is an "obscene waste of money" (Spoto 2012). Personally, the author finds such comments offensive and arrogant--as if scientific evidence has no place in education policy making. Clearly it does. Dismissing the issue of poverty in education ignores the long-standing and large scientific body of knowledge that demonstrates its impact (e.g., Coleman et al. 1966; Jencks et al. 1972). Poverty matters. There is too much evidence for bureaucrats to plead ignorance. It is time bureaucrats begin to address a root cause of underachievement: Poverty. It is time educators demand they do so.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Administrator Attitudes; Rural Education; Journal Articles; Teacher Educators; Principals; Leadership Role; Focus Groups; Small Schools; Accountability; Grouping (Instructional Purposes); Transformational Leadership; Teacher Administrator Relationship
Abstract:
This article reports a study of rural school principals' assessment leadership roles and the impact of rural context on their work. The study involved three focus groups of principals serving small rural schools of varied size and grade configuration in three systems. Principals viewed assessment as a matter of teacher accountability and as a focus for the school professional team. They saw themselves as teachers first, stressing their importance as sources of teacher support, serving a "buffer role," ameliorating external constraints to effective assessment and learning. Bureaucratic environments and trappings of large-scale assessment were seen to be incompatible with the familial nature of rural professional contexts. Other constraints were the logistical challenges of small student populations, higher instances of multi-graded classrooms, and the absence of grade-alike professional interaction. Conversely, smallness enabled professional interaction and transformational leadership. Finally, the quality of system-level support emerged as a critical catalyst for assessment leadership at the school level.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (357K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|