Author(s): |
N/A |
Source: |
What Works Clearinghouse |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-01-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Middle School Students; Grade 6; Grade 7; Grade 8; Science Achievement; Evidence; Scientific Concepts; Outcome Measures; Program Evaluation; Instructional Effectiveness; Science Process Skills; Science Activities
Abstract:
"Great Explorations in Math and Science"[R] ("GEMS"[R]) "The Real Reasons for Seasons" is a curriculum unit for grades 6-8 that focuses on the connections between the Sun and the Earth to teach students the scientific concepts behind the seasons. The unit utilizes models, hands-on investigations, peer-to-peer discussions, reflection, and informational student readings to help students understand science content and develop scientific investigation skills. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) identified one study on the effects of "GEMS"[R] "The Real Reasons for Seasons" on the science achievement of middle school students. The WWC reviewed this study against group design evidence standards. The study (Pyke, Lynch, Kuipers, Szesze, & Watson, 2004) is a randomized controlled trial that meets WWC evidence standards without reservations. This study is summarized in this report. Appended are: (1) Research details for Pyke et al. (2004); (2) Outcome measures for each domain; (3) Findings included in the rating for the general science achievement domain; and (4) Description of supplemental findings for the general science achievement domain. A glossary of terms is included. (Contains 4 tables, 6 endnotes and 2 additional sources.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (811K)
|
Author(s): |
N/A |
Source: |
Brookings Institution |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-02-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
International Organizations; Educational Improvement; Educational Objectives; Global Approach; Evaluation Methods; Achievement; Child Safety; Physical Health; Well Being; Social Development; Emotional Development; Interpersonal Competence; Art; Creative Activities; Cultural Education; Communication Skills; Literacy; Attention; Creativity; Critical Thinking; Numeracy; Mathematical Concepts; Technological Literacy; Science Process Skills
Abstract:
In the run-up to 2015 and beyond, the global education community must work together to improve learning and propose practical actions to deliver and measure progress. In response, UNESCO through its Institute for Statistics (UIS) and the Center for Universal Education (CUE) at the Brookings Institution have co-convened the Learning Metrics Task Force (LMTF). The project's main objective is to shift the focus of global education debates from access to access "plus" learning. Based on input from technical working groups and global consultations, the task force will make recommendations to help countries and international organizations measure and improve learning outcomes for children and youth worldwide. In the first phase of the project, the Standards Working Group prepared a series of initial recommendations to identify the competencies, knowledge or areas of learning that are important for all children and youth to master in order to succeed in school and life. This initial work (based on current discussions, policies and research) was then enriched following a broad consultation involving more than 500 individuals in 57 countries. The final Phase I recommendations from the task force are presented in its first report entitled, "Toward Universal Learning: What Every Child Should Learn," which presents a framework for what every child and youth should learn and be able to do by the time they reach postprimary age. Appended are: (1) Individuals Contributing to the Phase I Public Consultation Period; (2) Selected Global Dialogues and Frameworks on Learning Outcomes; (3) International, Regional and Cross-National Initiatives to Measure Learning; (4) Methodology; and (5) First Public Consultation Document. (Contains 4 figures, 3 tables, and 7 endnotes.) [This paper is a joint publication with the UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Additional funding for this paper was provided by Dubai Cares and the Douglas B. Marshall, Jr. Family Foundation.]
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Electronic Learning; Distance Education; Computer Simulation; Skill Development; Science Process Skills; Laboratory Experiments; Online Courses; Courseware; Virtual Classrooms; Science Course Improvement Projects; Engineering Education; Engineering Technology; Science Laboratories; Robotics; Teaching Methods
Abstract:
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present an improved concept of software-based laboratory exercises, namely a Virtual Laboratory for Engineering Sciences (VLES). Design/methodology/approach: The implementation of distance learning and e-learning in engineering sciences (such as Mechanical and Electrical Engineering) is still far behind current practice in narrative disciplines (Economics, Management, etc.). This is because education in technical disciplines requires laboratory exercises, providing skill-acquisition and hands-on experience. In order to overcome this problem for distance-learning developers and practitioners, a new modular and hierarchically organized approach is needed. Findings: The concept involves simulation models to emulate system dynamics, full virtual reality to provide visualization, advanced social-clubbing to ensure proper communication, and an AI tutor to supervise the lab work. Its modularity and hierarchical organization offer the possibility of applying the concept to practically any engineering field: a higher level provides the general framework--it considers lab workplaces as objects regardless of the technical field they come from, and provides communication and supervision--while the lower level deals with particular workplaces. An improved student's motivation is expected. Originality/value: The proposed concept aims rather high, thus making the work truly challenging. With the current level of information and communication technologies, some of the required features can only be achieved with difficulty; however, the rapid growth of the relevant technologies supports the eventual practicality of the concept. This paper is not intended to present any final results, solutions, or experience. The idea is to promote the concept, identify problems, propose guidelines, and possibly open a discussion. (Contains 15 figures, 1 table, and 4 notes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Ecology; Intermode Differences; Teaching Methods; Instructional Effectiveness; Context Effect; Science Process Skills; Process Education; Classroom Techniques; Botany; Hypothesis Testing; Concept Teaching; Transfer of Training; Grade 7; Best Practices
Abstract:
Understanding complex systems such as ecosystems is difficult for young K-12 students, and students' representations of ecosystems are often limited to nebulously defined relationships between macro-level structural components inherent to the ecosystem in focus (rainforest, desert, pond, etc.) instead of generalizing processes across ecosystems (photosynthesis, decomposition, etc.). This context-dependency might be related to the focus of ecosystem instruction. Most commonly, the components are the first to be introduced and are given the greatest attention in the teaching of ecological and other biological systems. Here, we test the hypothesis that process-centered understanding of ecosystems, as opposed to structured-centered understanding, can facilitate students' ability to transfer ecosystem concepts to new and novel ecosystems. We found that teachers who taught ecosystem processes more generally were associated with greater variation in student models, indicating a greater range of ideas being represented among the students. (Contains 1 table and 2 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-11-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Foreign Countries; Science Process Skills; Workshops; Scientists; Student Research; Seismology
Abstract:
The authors have been running UK-Japan Young Scientist Workshops at universities in Britain and Japan since 2001: for the past three years in England with Cambridge University and, last year, also with Kyoto University and Kyoto University of Education. For many years they have worked jointly with colleagues in a group of Super Science High Schools in Kyoto (as well as a number in Tokyo) but, since the devastating Japanese earthquake and tsunami of March 2011, they are now committed to working also with schools serving communities in the devastated Tohoku region. In this article, the author talks about the UK-Japan Young Scientist Workshop programme and the lessons learned for education.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|