|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-03-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Feedback (Response); Video Technology; Preservice Teachers; Microteaching; Educational Practices; Instructional Improvement; Teacher Improvement; Educational Methods; Vignettes; Educational Strategies; Lesson Plans; Material Development; Change Strategies; Praxis; Theory Practice Relationship
Abstract:
When teacher preparation is disconnected from classroom practice, preservice teachers are left to try to make this connection without the guidance and support of skilled mentors. Practicum or field experiences are essential for effective personnel preparation. Practicum experiences can provide situated learning for preservice teachers to "practice" newly acquired skills and apply new knowledge in real-life settings (Macy, Squires, & Barton, 2009). However, a fundamental disconnect often exists between what happens in early childhood field placements and what happens in college classrooms. Microteaching is one way to bridge this gap. The purpose of this article is to introduce microteach lessons as a powerful teaching tool for early childhood personnel preparation and to share the authors' experiences using microteach lessons within early childhood special education (ECSE) preservice training at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). The authors begin with a vignette followed by a description of microteach lessons and a brief review of literature on the use of these lessons in personnel preparation. Then, they share information about how the use of microteach lessons evolved at UIUC and provide a detailed description of the steps they follow when incorporating these lessons during ECSE preservice personnel preparation. They conclude with implications for practice. (Contains 3 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-01-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Interdisciplinary Approach; Applied Linguistics; Journal Articles; Audiences; Biochemistry; Flow Charts; English for Special Purposes; Language Styles; Text Structure; Teaching Methods; Comparative Analysis; Second Language Instruction; Second Language Learning; Material Development
Abstract:
This article highlights aspects of an interdisciplinary (chemistry-applied linguistics) English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course- and materials-development project. The project was aimed at raising genre awareness among chemistry students and faculty, in addition to improving students' disciplinary reading and writing. As part of the project, full-length chemistry journal articles were analyzed. We describe select results of this analysis and the prominent role played by chemists in the process. Emphasis is placed on the organizational structure of chemistry journal articles, focusing on the Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion (A-IMRDC) sections. Two predominant organizational patterns emerged from our analyses, specifically A-IMR[DC] and A-IM[R(DC)], with brackets signifying sections merged under one major heading. Move-analysis findings are converted into easy-to-interpret instructional tools labeled "move structures akin to flow charts" for two target audiences (chemistry students and faculty). The rhetorical structure of the chemistry journal article is then compared to journal articles published in biochemistry, an overlapping discipline. The article concludes with pedagogical implications and suggestions for ESP professionals engaged in genre analysis. (Contains 6 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Educational Technology; Educational Resources; Program Implementation; Open Source Technology; Material Development; Change Strategies; Instructional Design
Abstract:
Digital text, changes in textbook adoptions, 1-to-1 computing, Common Core standards, the rise in digital learning objects and online curricula, the push for personalized learning--all of these and other factors are part of an ongoing drama in education today that puts the future of curriculum materials very much in play. But thanks to open educational resources (OER), districts do not have to sit on the sidelines as non-participants in the game. Schools all over the country are taking their curriculum in hand and using OER sources to create their own course materials. Open educational resources provide benefits beyond cost savings, including the ability to differentiate the learning experience. The author presents some essential elements of a successful OER implementation.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Al-Surmi, Mansoor |
Source: |
TESOL Quarterly: A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect, v46 n4 p671-694 Dec 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-12-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Drama; Television; Programming (Broadcast); Material Development; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Second Language Instruction; Classification; Computational Linguistics; Interpersonal Communication; Discourse Analysis
Abstract:
Television shows, especially soap operas and sitcoms, are usually considered by English as a second language practitioners as a source of authentic spoken conversational materials presumably because they reflect the linguistic features of natural conversation. However, practitioners are faced with the dilemma of how to assess whether such conversational materials reflect the linguistic characteristics of natural ones. Previous classifications were based on practitioners' personal impressions and intuitions. The present study shows that this subjective approach is problematic and instead adopts a corpus-based register analysis tool to investigate the extent to which soap opera, compared to sitcom, reflects the linguistic representation of natural conversation. The tool is the multidimensional analysis developed by Biber (1988). Findings indicate that sitcom captures the linguistic features of natural conversation more than soap opera does. Implications for research, teaching, and teaching materials development are discussed. (Contains 6 figures and 2 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-11-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Foreign Countries; Instructional Materials; Material Development; Journal Writing; Diaries; Interviews; College Faculty; Graduate Students; Teaching Assistants; Graduate Study; Technology Integration; Handheld Devices; Educational Technology; Guidelines; College Instruction; Layout (Publications); Electronic Publishing; Computer Software; Programming Languages; Qualitative Research; Observation; Program Descriptions
Abstract:
This study explores how to make diverse learning/instructional materials compatible with e-readers when the instructor pioneered to adopt e-readers into a course of the graduate level. What problems did the instructor encounter when she used the e-readers as a major tool to deliver learning contents, such as the process of converting the traditional instructional materials into the adequate file formats compatible with e-readers? Was it easy or challenging? What converting tools should be used? What additional efforts were required? To shed light on appropriately adopting e-readers as a learning tool in the classroom, the authors conducted this study on making various instructional materials for those popular e-readers in the market, Kindle and iPad. The study focuses on the following three aspects: (1) the process of learning materials design and file conversion; (2) the efforts and time spent on design; and (3) the principles of digitalizing materials before conversion. This study concludes that it is challenging but feasible to make diverse learning materials compatible with e-readers integrated into a classroom setting given the current situation that instructors often use a variety of learning materials from different resources as indicated in this study. Importantly, the instructor and teaching assistants had tackled the big fundamental issue, the file conversion. However, through this study, some ideal converting tools were identified as a better solution. However, additional time and efforts were required from the instructor and teaching assistants. The results of this study indicate that to make the best use of e-reader, converting to specific formats, EPUB and AZW, is necessary as the critical initial step. However, it is evident that the diversity of layout in the original PDF file makes conversion work time-consuming. To shorten working time, some principles of digitalizing material before conversion are suggested as guidelines: (1) Principle 1: Change multicolumn layout to one-column layout; (2) Principle 2: Delete unnecessary header, footer and page number; (3) Principle 3: Save table and chart as graph; (4) Principle 4: Avoid paragraph and graph display side by side; and (5) Principle 5: Do not use PNG format graph (It will become the black background). (Contains 6 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|