Author(s): |
N/A |
Source: |
What Works Clearinghouse |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-03-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Emergent Literacy; Preschool Education; Curriculum Enrichment; Preschool Children; School Readiness; Oral Language; Phonology; Mathematics; Instructional Effectiveness; Educational Research
Abstract:
"Ladders to Literacy" is a supplemental early literacy curriculum composed of 60 activities designed to develop children's print/book awareness, metalinguistic awareness, and oral language skills. The "Ladders to Literacy" activities can be implemented in a variety of early childhood settings and adapted for children with special needs. Although a "Ladders to Literacy" curriculum is also available for kindergarten students, this intervention report focuses on the preschool "Ladders to Literacy" supplemental early literacy curriculum. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) identified two studies of "Ladders to Literacy" that both fall within the scope of the Early Childhood Education topic area and meet WWC evidence standards. One study meets WWC evidence standards without reservations and one study meets WWC evidence standards with reservations, and together, they included 139 children in 26 preschool classrooms in southern New Hampshire. The WWC considers the extent of evidence for "Ladders to Literacy" on the school readiness of preschool children to be small for four outcome domains--oral language, print knowledge, phonological processing, and math. There were no studies that meet standards in early reading and writing, and cognition, so WWC does not report on the effectiveness of "Ladders to Literacy" for those domains in this intervention report. Appended are: (1) Research details for Russell, 2005; (2) Research details for PCER Consortium, 2008; (3) Outcome measures for each domain; (4) Findings included in the rating for the oral language domain; (5) Findings included in the rating for the print knowledge domain; (6) Findings included in the rating for the phonological processing domain; and (7) Findings included in the rating for the math domain. A glossary of terms is included. (Contains 8 tables and 8 endnotes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (181K)
|
Author(s): |
N/A |
Source: |
What Works Clearinghouse |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-01-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Elementary School Students; Peer Teaching; Elementary School Mathematics; Learning Strategies; Mathematics Achievement; Mathematics Skills; Educational Improvement; Video Technology; Elementary Education; Curriculum Enrichment; Tutoring; Evidence; Outcome Measures; Program Evaluation
Abstract:
"Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies" is a peer-tutoring program for grades K-6 that aims to improve student proficiency in math and other disciplines. This report focuses on "Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies" for math. The math program supplements students' existing math curriculum and is based on peer-mediated instruction, a process whereby students work in pairs or small groups to tutor each other. During tutoring sessions, students work together on worksheets that target specific math skills, with one student designated to correct his or her partner's errors, award points for correct responses, and provide consistent encouragement and feedback. The program uses videos and teacher-provided scripted instruction to train students to engage in peer tutoring. Developers recommend that students participate in peer-tutoring sessions two to three times a week for approximately 30 minutes per session. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) identified 13 studies that investigated the effects of "Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies" on the math performance of elementary school students. The WWC reviewed all of those studies against group design evidence standards. One study (Fuchs, Fuchs, Yazdian, & Powell, 2002) is a randomized controlled trial that meets WWC evidence standards without reservations. The study is summarized in this report. Four studies do not meet WWC evidence standards. The remaining eight studies do not meet WWC eligibility screens for review in this topic area. Appended are: (1) Research details for Fuchs et al. (2002); (2) Outcome measures for each domain; (3) Findings included in the rating for the mathematics achievement domain; and (4) Description of supplemental findings for the mathematics achievement domain. A glossary of terms is included. (Contains 4 tables and 4 endnotes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (310K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-07-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Educational Technology; Calculus; Mathematics Education; Lesson Plans; Engineering Technology; Student Centered Curriculum; Science Course Improvement Projects; Engineering Education; Mathematics Activities; Mathematics Curriculum; Curriculum Development; Curriculum Enrichment; Curriculum Evaluation; Learning Modules; Courseware; Teacher Attitudes; Instructional Material Evaluation; Teaching Methods; Educational Change
Abstract:
Engineering technology students can attain a meaningful mathematics learning if they are allowed to actively participate in hands-on activities. However, the current dissemination of knowledge in the classroom still focuses on teacher-centered paradigm of teaching. A study to explore lecturers' views regarding a newly developed integral calculus with Maple software module was conducted. Nine lecturers with at least eight years of teaching experience were involved in the evaluation of the module. They were brought to a computer laboratory at the university to evaluate the activities developed in the module using a newly developed manual. Within six hours, they attempted and evaluated the assigned activity in groups. Each of the lecturers wrote his or her comments on the activities, manual and lesson plans booklets. Their comments were qualitatively analyzed to provide a guideline in producing a meaningful module in teaching and learning of integral calculus. From their written comments, there were two main findings obtained. Firstly, they highlighted the importance of giving reflective questions at the end of each subtopic to train the engineering technology students to critically aware about their thinking skills. Secondly, some of the lecturers believed that by giving counter-examples, these students will develop a better conceptual understanding in each newly learnt topic. Apart from these two main findings, other comments were also considered in modifying the manual, lesson plans and set of six integral calculus activities. As a result, a module which emphasized on student-centered learning based on conceptual and procedural understanding and metacognitive awareness teaching approach will be produced. This module will be used to enhance students' procedural and conceptual understanding in learning integral calculus at the university. (Contains 7 tables and 1 figure.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (421K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Social Justice; Administrator Education; Instructional Leadership; Praxis; Curriculum Design; Curriculum Development; Critical Theory; Culturally Relevant Education; Change Strategies; Educational Change; Leadership Training; Transformational Leadership; Curriculum Enrichment
Abstract:
This article argues that a framework of educational leadership must be so designed as to specifically speak to the transitioning demographics in schools in the United States. Particularly salient is a framework that addresses the issue of race within a broader context of social justice. The article outlines five ingredients of such a framework, including self-reflection, a grounding in a critical theoretical construction, a prophetic and pragmatic edge, praxis, and the inclusion of race language. Furthermore, the article outlines pragmatic ways in which educational leadership preparation programs can address the failures of the dominant system to embrace and struggle with the American issue of race in education. The impact of racism and the efficacy of the blending of self-reflection, introspection, as well as intellectual work are discussed as viable vehicles to deal with the matters of race in preparing prospective school leaders. The article concludes with the presentation of a proposed curriculum module, a project undertaken by the University Council for Educational Administration, to assist leadership preparation programs in addressing, through innovative instruction, the notions of privilege and race in their programs. (Contains 1 note.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-09-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Problem Based Learning; Engineering Education; Engineering Technology; Design; Teaching Methods; Classroom Environment; Classroom Techniques; Student Diversity; Science Course Improvement Projects; Instructional Design; Instructional Development; Cultural Context; Curriculum Enrichment; Enrichment Activities; Case Studies; Teacher Education Programs
Abstract:
It is well documented that there is a disproportionate number of males pursuing engineering and technology careers when compared to their female counterparts (Milgram, 2011). Some recent articles have proposed methods to recruit more females into technology education (Milgram, 2011; Zywno, Gilbride, Hiscodes, Waalen, and Kennedy, 1999). However, very little has been written about the impact on the classroom culture, especially in terms of how this can impact the diversity of student design teams. In this article, the authors will present a new approach to teaching design through the study of a real-world local or global problem that can be improved through engineering design. Through these real-world engineering problems, students are given opportunities to explore the cultural, social, political, and environmental aspects embedded within the problem. Personal accounts from a student perspective of this new learning approach to engineering design will be provided to show how team members have been affected. (Contains 1 table.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|