|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-03-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Higher Education; Foreign Countries; Economic Progress; Educational Objectives; Training; Public Policy; Vocational Education; Labor Needs; Elementary Secondary Education; Population Distribution; Economics; Employment; Educational Policy; Educational Finance; Expenditures; Corporate Education; Graduate Study; Universities
Abstract:
Peru is in the central, western part of South America. It is the third largest country in South America and number 20 in the world. It is the country with the fourth highest population in South America. In 2010, the gross domestic product (GDP) of Peru was 154 billion USD, and its rate of growth was 8.8% (higher than the average for the region for the last 5 years). 56.8% of employed population was in the tertiary sector, 26.7% in the primary and mining sector and only 16.5% worked in manufacturing and construction. These figures are quite stable for the last years with a slight decrease in the primary sector (in 2006, it employed 32.9% of total employees), which went to the secondary sector (it was 14.2% in 2006) and the service sector (52.9% that year). In the period considered, employment has increased significantly in Peru due to economic growth. However, it is important to note that the rate of informality in the economy remains very high, with figures above 60%. The informal sector creates many "bad" jobs, without social insurance and other benefits normally provided by the formal sector. In this paper, the authors first describe the training and development policies; secondly, the higher and non-higher educational systems; finally, they display some statistics related to educational expenditure as well as Peru's strategic educational objectives. (Contains 6 tables, 4 figures and 2 footnotes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Karp, Stan |
Source: |
Rethinking Schools, v26 n3 p34-39 Spr 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Opinion Papers |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Social Justice; Educational Change; Corporate Education; Public Education; School Restructuring; Resistance to Change; Educational Policy; Policy Analysis; Teacher Evaluation; Activism; Change Strategies; Politics of Education
Abstract:
Corporate school reformers like to call themselves just "reformers" and counterpose themselves to the "status quo." There is no doubt that the corporate/foundation crowd has successfully captured the media label as "education reformers." However, this political branding has little to do with reality or the substance of the issues under debate. Like many others who oppose corporate school reform, the author has spent years criticizing the flawed institutions and policies of public education as a teacher, an education activist, and a policy advocate. "Rethinking Schools" has been pressing for radical reform of public education and for student-centered, social justice education since it began 25 years ago. But with debate about education policy now sharply politicized and polarized, there are added reasons to look beyond the rhetoric. Examining closely what the corporate education reform movement proposes and what it actually delivers can help expose where it is vulnerable to the most hopeful development of the last two years--the steady growth of a deep, broad, and at times quite militant pushback against the corporate reform agenda. The failures of the corporate education "reform" movement leave it vulnerable to genuine grassroots school transformation. In this article, the author takes a look at what corporate reformers have actually achieved when it comes to addressing the real problems of public education. The author also offers a quick survey of 10 hopeful, tangible signs of growing resistance to the corporate reform agenda.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Jo, Il-Hyun |
Source: |
Educational Technology & Society, v15 n1 p289-297 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Foreign Countries; Electronic Learning; Instructional Design; Teamwork; Structural Equation Models; Behavior Theories; Interaction; Surveys; Group Dynamics; Statistical Analysis; Corporate Education
Abstract:
The primary purpose of the study was to investigate team-based e-Learning content development projects from the perspective of the shared mental model (SMM) theory. The researcher conducted a study of 79 e-Learning content development teams in Korea to examine the relationship between taskwork and teamwork SMMs and the performance of the teams. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the parameter estimations. As hypothesized, the results indicated that interaction among e-Learning ID team members led to higher SMMs (Ed- this acronym has already been defined above) which in turn improved the team performance. Meanwhile, the interaction decreased with the progression of ID projects and with the role differentiation. The implications of the findings and directions for instructional design (ID) practices are discussed. (Contains 3 tables and 1 figure.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Profiles; Evaluation Criteria; Role Models; Best Practices; Professional Recognition; Recognition (Achievement); Trainers; Change Agents; Industrial Training; Corporate Education; Job Performance; Success; Training Methods; Training Objectives; Instructional Leadership; Teacher Effectiveness; Evaluation Methods; Teacher Evaluation
Abstract:
Supercharged. High-performers. Leaders of the pack. This article presents "Training" magazine's 2012 Top Young Trainers--those high-potential training professionals who are on the fast track to success. For the fifth year, "Training" magazine is pleased to recognize the outstanding talents, accomplishments, and leadership exhibited by 40 learning professionals age 40 and under. The young leaders profiled in this article were nominated by their industry peers in January and selected by "Training's" editor-in-chief and an independent judging panel comprising members of "Training's" Editorial Advisory Board. To qualify, candidates were required to possess a minimum of three years' experience in the training field and manage one or more direct reports or lead a large-scale training/learning and development initiative. Nominees also were judged on criteria including: (1) Leadership skills; (2) Demonstrated career progression in an accelerated timeframe; (3) Proven success in meeting a difficult training challenge or completing a training turnaround job; (4) Development of innovative training solutions or programs; (5) The ability to consistently produce training results (as evaluated by the Kirkpatrick model); (6) A demonstrated ability to design training programs that are strategically aligned with the business; and (7) Technical competence. In this article, the author provides in-depth profiles of the Top 10 Young Trainers (listed in alphabetical order), plus shorter profiles of the other 30 Top Young Trainers. She also provides a "10 to Watch" list, which features up-and-coming leaders who didn't receive an award this year, but who are well on their way to becoming future Top Young Trainers.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Corporate Education; Labor Force Development; Job Training; Industrial Training; Proprietary Schools; Hospitality Occupations; Educational Opportunities; Recognition (Achievement); Best Practices; Educational Practices; Industrial Psychology; Performance Technology
Abstract:
Preparing employees for the immediate work in front of them is a challenge. While most companies are still mastering effectively training their own workforce, some, such as "Training" magazine Top 10 Hall of Famer The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, have set up for-profit academies open to the public. When Ritz-Carlton won the national Malcolm Baldrige Award not once but twice in the 1990s, the company knew it had an opportunity. The hotel, renowned for its customer service, had become a master at creating engaged and loyal guests. The way it did that was through a workforce that fully understood what it meant to keep those guests happy. The company's Learning and Development professionals wondered if they could benefit other organizations by sharing the lessons they taught their own employees. In addition to being a good corporate citizen, the company knew that sharing its customer service training wisdom also could generate a new profit stream. It wasn't long before The Ritz-Carlton Leadership Center, a corporate university open to the public, was born. In this article Diana Oreck, The Ritz-Carlton Leadership Center Vice President, offers some advice.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|