|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-26 |
Pub Type(s): |
Collected Works - Proceedings |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Thinking Skills; Academic Libraries; Information Literacy; Management Systems; Organizational Change; Adult Students; Instructional Design; Video Technology; Web Sites; Electronic Publishing; Critical Thinking; Diaries; Shared Resources and Services; Library Services; Marketing; Social Networks; Library Materials; Electronic Libraries; College Libraries; Educational Technology; Technology Uses in Education; Search Strategies; Orientation; Library Instruction; College Students; Nontraditional Education; Reference Materials; Energy Conservation; Teacher Education; Librarian Teacher Cooperation; Online Searching
Abstract:
Twenty scholarly papers and fifteen abstracts comprise the content of the twelfth annual Brick and Click Libraries Symposium, held at Northwest Missouri State University in Maryville, Missouri. The peer-reviewed proceedings, authored by academic librarians and presented at the symposium, portray the contemporary and future face of librarianship. The 2012 paper and abstract titles include: (1) Brave New World (Laura Heinz and Carrye Syma); (2) Using Blogs to Develop Critical Thinking Skills (Ericka Arvidson Raber); (3) From Overloaded to Opportunity: The Search for a Low-Cost Interlibrary Loan Management System (Ellie Kohler and Danielle Theiss); (4) Thriving in the E-Resource Amusement Park: Using the ADDIE Instructional Design Model as a Management Framework (Galadriel Chilton and Chenwei Zhao); (5) Exposure = Impact: Library Marketing, Promotion and Branding (Rene Erlandson and Teonne Wright); (6) Using Gimlet to Improve Service at the Library (Jessica Tipton, Barry Bailey, and Mark Swails); (7) Tweet Tweet: Using Twitter for Library Marketing and Outreach (Jaleh Fazelian); (8) Library (R)Evolution: Organizational Change and Library Effectiveness (Colleen S. Harris); (9) Caught in the Act (Anne Deutsch and Brooks Doherty); (10) Giving the Users What They Want: Is Patron-Driven Acquisitions the Answer? (Buddy Pennington and Steve Alleman); (11) Streaming Video Acquisitions: Vendors, Models and Workflows (Stephanie Viola); (12) Rediscovering Relevance for the Science & Engineering Library (Patrick "Tod" Colegrove); (13) A Tale of Two Libraries: How Two Universities Prepared for the Future with Ex Libris Alma (John Ross, Heath Bogart, Rebecca Fernandez, and Daniel Winslow); (14) Information in a Dash: Painless & Penniless Statistical Reports (Joyce Neujahr and Emily Kesten); (15) 10 Ways to Google-It BETTER (Kristy Steigerwalt); (16) You've got a Friend: Attracting, Welcoming and Supporting the Adult Learner through Tailored Orientations (MaryAlice Wade and Maggie Denning); (17) Library Outreach through One Book One Community (Melissa Dennis); (18) The Zombie's Guide to Information Literacy: Reaching College Students in Non-traditional Ways (Cynthia Dudenhoffer); (19) A Reference Services Voyage: How a Small Academic Library Doubled its Reference Statistics in One Year (Danielle Theiss); (20) E-book Metadata in ILS and Discovery Tools (Lixia Zhao, Linda Wen, Donna K. Rose, and Maureen James); (21) Streamlined Workflow + McNaughton = Success! (Cheryl L. Blevens); (22) Chasing Green: An Academic Library's In-House Solution to Save Resources and Change Policy about Energy Conservation (Jeff Simpson); (23) Supporting Mobiles: It's More Than a Link and a Click (Robert Hallis); (24) User Side Open Access: The High Stakes of Open Access at Teaching Colleges (Mark Swails); (25) Auto-Populating an ILL form using OpenURL and JavaScript (Sarah G. Park); (26) Librarian-Faculty Collaboration for Student Learning (Carolyn Johnson); (27) Comparative Preferences for eBooks and Paper/Printed Books (Leila June Rod-Welch, Barbara E. Weeg, Jerry V. Caswell, and Thomas L. Kessler); (28) Managing Information: Lessons for the 21st Century (Robert Hallis); (29) Making Your Library (Pin)teresting! Using the Online Pinboard to Promote Library Resources (Marty Miller); (30) Give Them the Gift That Keeps On Giving--Providing Meaningful Tools for Student Employee Success (Joyce Meldrem); (31) We Built It, Why Didn't They Come? (Joelle Pitts, Laura Bonella, and Jason Coleman); (32) Give your Instruction a Boost of Creativity! (Benjamin Oberdick); (33) Size Doesn't Matter: Use Responsive Design to Fit On Any Screen (Roy Degler); (34) If You Build It, They Will Come: A First-Year Assessment of a Newly-Built Academic Library (Megan Donald and Stewart Brower), and (35) Copyright and Intellectual Property: Teaching Creatively (Mason Yang and Gail Flatness). An author/title index is also included. (Individual papers contain references). [Abstract modified to meet ERIC guidelines. For the 2011 proceedings, see ED526899.]
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (3331K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2007-01-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Physical Activity Level; Middle Schools; Middle School Students; Lunch Programs; Females; Intramural Athletics; Health Education; Extramural Athletics; Physical Activities; School Policy; Health Behavior; Recess Breaks; Educational Environment; Physical Education; School Community Programs
Abstract:
Background: This study examined physical activity opportunities and barriers at 36 geographically diverse middle schools participating in the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls. Methods: Principals, physical education and health education department heads, and program leaders were interviewed to assess policies and instructional practices that support physical activity. Results: Schools provided approximately 110 hours per year in physical education instruction. Approximately 20% of students walked or bicycled to school. Eighty-three percent of schools offered interscholastic sports and 69% offered intramural sports. Most schools offered programs for girls, but on average, only 24 girls (approximately 5%) in the schools attended any programs. Only 25% of schools allowed after school free play. An overall score created to assess school environmental support for physical activity indicated that, on average, schools met 6.7 items of 10 items. Free/reduced lunch program participation versus not (p = 0.04), perceived priority of physical education instruction over coaching (p = 0.02), and safety for walking/bicycling to school (p = 0.02) predicted environmental support score. Conclusions: Schools have policies and practices that support physical activity, although unfavorable practices exist. Schools must work with community partners and officials to provide environments that optimally support physical activity, especially schools that serve low-income students.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2007-02-20 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Preservice Teacher Education; Teacher Education Programs; Elementary Secondary Education; Technology Integration; Teacher Surveys; Field Experience Programs; Educational Technology; Teaching Experience; Teacher Education; Technology Uses in Education; Data Analysis
Abstract:
The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine the perceptions of technology integration by 90 entry level students in a teacher education program. During their field experience placement, candidates observed teachers' integration of technology in the classroom. During the final week of observation, the candidates completed a modified version of BETA 04-05 Teacher Survey (Biennial Educational Technology Assessment). The BETA Teacher Survey is a self-report online instrument developed by eTech Ohio (2004) to assess how technology supports classroom curricular needs. Demographic information was reported and the second part of the survey identified strategies for technology integration. Candidates ranked the frequency of technology use by K-12 teachers and students in the classrooms. A university statistician unfamiliar with the candidates or the course analyzed the data statistically using the SPSS software program. Results indicate that teaching experience had a significant effect on use of technology for data manipulation/organization because teachers with less experience were more apt to use technology for data management. This study illustrates that if teachers possess the requisite technology skills they are more likely to integrate educational technologies in their instructional repertoires which can enhance the learning of all students. It also sheds light on the impact of technological advancements in a variety of academic environments and areas as well as how changes in practice are occurring (or not occurring) in these settings. It is imperative that teacher education ensure that preservice candidates are indeed provided the opportunity to explore and develop effective uses of technology in K-12 classrooms. Additionally, teacher education must promote technology use in authentic contexts through curriculum-based, technology-enhanced field experiences.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (33K)
|
Author(s): |
Young, Deborah Rohm; Johnson, Carolyn C.; Steckler, Allan; Gittelsohn, Joel; Saunders, Ruth P.; Saksvig, Brit I.; Ribisl, Kurt M.; Lytle, Leslie A.; McKenzie, Thomas L. |
Source: |
Health Education & Behavior, v33 n1 p97-111 2006 |
|
Pub Date: |
2006-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Physical Education; Middle Schools; Intervention; Health Education; Physical Activities; Females; Formative Evaluation; Action Research; Theory Practice Relationship; Technology Transfer; Health Promotion; Program Descriptions; Program Development; Health Behavior
Abstract:
Formative research is used to inform intervention development, but the processes of transmitting results to intervention planners and incorporating information into intervention designs are not well documented. The authors describe how formative research results from the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG) were transferred to planners to guide intervention development. Methods included providing oral and written reports, prioritizing recommendations, and cross-checking recommendations with intervention objectives and implementation strategies. Formative work influenced the intervention in many ways. For example, results indicated that middle schools offered only coeducational physical education and health education classes, so the TAAG intervention was designed to be appropriate for both sexes, and intervention strategies were developed to directly address girls' stated preferences (e.g., enjoyable activities, opportunity to socialize) and barriers (e.g., lack of skills, fear of injury) for physical activity. The challenges of using formative research for intervention development are discussed. (Contains 1 figure and 4 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Gittelsohn, Joel; Steckler, Allan; Johnson, Carolyn C.; Pratt, Charlotte; Grieser, Mira; Pickrel, Julie; Stone, Elaine J.; Conway, Terry; Coombs, Derek; Staten, Lisa K. |
Source: |
Health Education & Behavior, v33 n1 p25-39 2006 |
|
Pub Date: |
2006-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Physical Activities; Adolescents; Females; Intervention; Focus Groups; Community Programs; Health Programs; Goal Orientation; Research Methodology; Formative Evaluation
Abstract:
Formative research uses qualitative and quantitative methods to provide information for researchers to plan intervention programs. Gaps in the formative research literature include how to define goals, implementation plans, and research questions; select methods; analyze data; and develop interventions. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute funded the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG), a randomized, multicenter field trial, to reduce the decline in physical activity in adolescent girls. The goals of the TAAG formative research are to (a) describe study communities and schools, (b) help design the trial's interventions, (c) develop effective recruitment and retention strategies, and (d) design evaluation instruments. To meet these goals, a variety of methods, including telephone interviews, surveys and checklists, semistructured interviews, and focus group discussions, are employed. The purpose, method of development, and analyses are explained for each method. (Contains 2 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|