|
|
Pub Date: |
2010-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Higher Education; Course Descriptions; Role; Teacher Expectations of Students; College Faculty; Teacher Student Relationship; Classroom Communication; Content Analysis; Online Searching; Internet; Selection; Differences; Intellectual Disciplines; Grading; Educational Policy; Attendance; Ethics; Tests; Scheduling
Abstract:
Syllabus use in higher education instruction is ubiquitous, yet what actually constitutes a syllabus remains unclear. The authors assessed the contents of 1000 syllabi, sampled from the Internet, based on 26 criteria determined from a literature review of recommended syllabus components. Syllabi contents were assessed according to four categories: professor information, course information, grading information, and policy information. In addition, each syllabus was categorized by content area domain and academic level. An analysis of the contents of the syllabi demonstrated that the most frequently included syllabus components were course name, course number, professor name, and course texts, and that the least frequently included syllabus components comprised almost entirely policies--specifically, honor code policy, disability policy, missed work policy, late work policy, and student support services. Analyses based on content area domain and academic level demonstrated little systematic variance. Overall, faculty tended to include more professor information, course information, and grading information, than policy information. These findings provide evidence for the need to include greater policy information--honor code, disability, technology, attendance, and student support policies--on syllabi to better inform students. (Contains 10 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2009-07-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Recall (Psychology); Individual Differences; Short Term Memory; History Instruction; Educational Technology; Multimedia Instruction
Abstract:
Research in multimedia learning lacks an emphasis on individual difference variables, such as working memory capacity (WMC). The effects of WMC and the segmentation of multimedia instruction were examined by assessing the recall and application of low (n = 66) and high (n = 67) working memory capacity students randomly assigned to either a segmented instruction (SI) or non-segmented instruction (NSI) version of a multimedia tutorial on historical inquiry. WMC was found to have a significant, positive effect on participants' recall and application scores; however, the use of segmentation mediated the effects of WMC to allow learners with lower WMC to recall and apply equal to those with higher WMC.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2008-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Physical Activities; Recall (Psychology); Short Term Memory; Multimedia Instruction; Measures (Individuals); Individual Differences; Learning Processes; Simulation; Transfer of Training; Computer Assisted Instruction; Electronic Equipment; Educational Environment
Abstract:
The present study examined the effects of individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) on learning from an historical inquiry multimedia tutorial in stationary versus mobile learning environments using a portable digital media player (i.e., iPod). Students with low (n = 44) and high (n = 40) working memory capacity, as measured by the OSPAN memory span test, were randomly assigned to either a stationary (n = 54) or mobile (n = 30) instructional environment. In the stationary environment, participants viewed the tutorial while sitting in a chair at a desk in a computer lab. In the mobile environment, participants walked down a hallway following a course indicated by signs on the floor. This walking and navigating, while engaging in the multimedia tutorial, simulated the type of environment one might encounter while walking across a college campus. Overall, students with high WMC outperformed students with low WMC on measures of recall and transfer of the historical inquiry strategy. In addition, students in a stationary instructional environment outperformed students in a mobile instructional environment. Finally, interaction effects indicated that low WMC students in a mobile instructional environment performed the most poorly. (Contains 2 tables and 4 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2008-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Undergraduate Students; Learning Strategies; Tutorial Programs; Multimedia Materials; Information Technology; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)
Abstract:
This article reports on the findings of a study designed to assess the utility of a multimedia tutorial intended to scaffold the development of historical source analysis through the use of the SCIM strategy. Seventy-seven undergraduate students (29 males, 48 females) with a mean age of 19.4 years engaged in a 2.5-hour tutorial across three instructional episodes. Students were assessed for retention of the SCIM strategy following each instructional episode (posttests 1-3) and assessed for the application of the SCIM strategy both before the instructional episodes (pretest) and following each episode (posttests 1-3). The results indicate that students learned to recall the SCIM strategy well and apply the first three, of four, stages of the SCIM strategy to new historical sources. This study joins a growing body of empirical research designed to examine how digital technologies can support the teaching and learning of the doing of history. (Contains 3 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2007-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Classification; Institutional Characteristics; Course Descriptions; Gender Differences; Undergraduate Study; College Faculty
Abstract:
The purpose of this research was to explore the effects that gender and institutional classification have on the inclusion of syllabus components. Course syllabi (N = 350) written by men and women from seven types of institutions, based on Carnegie classification, were sampled and evaluated for the presence of 26 syllabus components. The gender data clearly indicated that there were no gender effects by individual syllabus component and only one gender effect by syllabus component category; that is, females included more policy information than males. In addition, while there were institutional classification effects, there were no clear patterns of effect. (Contains 7 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (83K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2004-04-01 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Historians; History Instruction; Primary Sources; Teaching Methods; Learning Strategies; Inferences; Historical Interpretation
Abstract:
Understanding history is a challenge. In order to provide teachers with a tool that can help students acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to interpret primary sources and reconcile various historical accounts, the authors developed the SCIM-C strategy. Grounded in research on teaching and learning history and building upon Riley's layers of inference model to support teaching evidential understanding, the SCIM-C strategy focuses on five broad phases: Summarizing, Contextualizing, Inferring, Monitoring, and Corroborating. When students examine an individual source, they move through the first four phases (i.e., summarizing, contextualizing, inferring, and monitoring) and then, after analyzing several individual sources, they compare the sources collectively in the fifth phase (i.e., corroborating). This article explains each of the five phases of the SCIM-C strategy, including the four spiraling analyzing questions for each phase.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2003-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Constructivism (Learning); Technology Integration; Educational Technology; Social Studies; Theory Practice Relationship; Knowledge Base for Teaching
Abstract:
The National Council for the Social Studies has explicitly advocated technology integration into the social studies classroom to transform the teaching and learning of key social studies content and skills. While the call for technology integration into the social studies classroom is clear, the application of technology within the realm of social studies has traditionally been theoretically underdeveloped. One theoretical foundation that has promise for framing the discussion of technology and social studies integration is constructivism. Within this paper the current relationship between social studies education and technology is explored, the nature of constructivist philosophy, theory, and pedagogy is delineated, and principles for the integration of technology in social studies that supports an explicit constructivist foundation are posited. (Contains 1 table, 1 figure, and 5 notes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|