Author(s): |
N/A |
Source: |
Actuarial Foundation |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Graphs; Grade 4; Grade 5; Grade 6; Mathematics Instruction; Mathematics Skills; Mathematical Concepts; Class Activities; Mathematics Activities; Worksheets; Lesson Plans; Instructional Materials; Reprography; Visual Aids; Teaching Guides; Academic Standards; National Standards; Relevance (Education); Conservation (Environment); Environmental Education; Recycling; Alignment (Education); Word Problems (Mathematics)
Abstract:
"Bars, Lines, & Pies" is a dynamic math program designed to build graphing skills in students, while also showing them the relevance of math in their lives. Developed by The Actuarial Foundation along with Scholastic, the graphing lessons and activities involve engaging, real-world examples about the environment and recycling. In these lessons, students will create, apply, and analyze pie charts, bar graphs, and line graphs.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
 Show
 Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
 ERIC
Full Text (2197K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Grades (Scholastic); Evidence; Algebra; Grade 7; Foreign Countries; Mathematics Education; Thinking Skills; Games; Mathematics Instruction; Mathematics; Teaching Methods; Educational Research; Mathematical Concepts
Abstract:
There is a growing movement toward the introduction of algebra in early grades. This is supported by an increasing number of research studies that have reported success in getting young students to "do" mathematics considered beyond their reach. Yet, the consensus is that more research is needed to provide insights into the processes by which students make sense of algebraic ideas. In particular, more studies are needed on how nonlinear functions can be introduced in early grades. This article reports an algebra research strand that introduced seventh grade students to quadratic functions using Guess-My-Rule games. The article describes several instances of the students engaging successfully with ideas and forms of reasoning involving quadratic functions. The purpose is to contribute to the debate on the introduction of algebra in early grades by providing further evidence of young students' ability to engage with algebraic ideas usually considered to be beyond their reach.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
 Help |
 Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
N/A |
Source: |
What Works Clearinghouse |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-02-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Public School Teachers; Elementary School Teachers; Urban Schools; Academic Achievement; Elementary School Students; Grade 4; Grade 5; Grade 6; Grade 7; Grade 8; Teacher Persistence; Mentors; Teacher Leadership; Teacher Salaries; Incentives; Program Effectiveness; Educational Research
Abstract:
The study reviewed in this paper examined whether the Chicago Public Schools' Teacher Advancement Program (Chicago TAP), which provides mentoring, leadership opportunities, and financial incentives to teachers, improved student academic achievement and teacher retention. The study used two designs to answer distinct research questions. Under the first design, a randomized controlled trial, the authors examined the academic achievement of more than 7,600 students in grades 4-8 from 34 public schools in Chicago. In the spring of 2007 and again in the spring of 2009, groups of schools were randomly assigned either to participate in Chicago TAP during the coming school year or to serve as a comparison group for a year and participate in Chicago TAP during the following school year. The effect of Chicago TAP on academic achievement after one year of implementation was estimated by comparing the spring math, reading, and science achievement of students in Chicago TAP schools to the achievement of students in schools that had not yet implemented the program. Using the second design, a quasi-experiment, the study examined teachers' retention rates, defined as remaining in the same school from year to year. The effect of Chicago TAP on teacher retention was assessed by comparing the retention of teachers in Chicago TAP schools with the retention of a matched sample of teachers in non-TAP Chicago public schools (sample sizes varied across years). After one year of implementation, students attending Chicago TAP schools did not score significantly differently in math, reading, or science achievement, as measured by the Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT), than students attending comparison schools. Sixty-seven percent of teachers who were employed in schools that first implemented Chicago TAP in the fall of 2007 were still teaching in the same school in the fall of 2010. In contrast, 56% of teachers employed in non-TAP public schools were retained during the same period. This 12 percentage point difference in three-year teacher retention rates between the original cohort of Chicago TAP and non-TAP schools was statistically significant. The analysis of student academic achievement meets the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evidence standards with reservations. The analysis of teacher retention meets WWC evidence standards with reservations. Appended are: (1) Study details; (2) Outcome measures for each domain; (3) Study findings for each domain; and (4) Supplemental findings by domain. A glossary of terms is included. (Contains 3 endnotes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (199K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Books; Guides - Classroom - Teacher |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Testing Accommodations; English Language Learners; Evidence; Meta Analysis; Educational Research; Language Usage; Test Construction; Dictionaries; Language of Instruction; Timed Tests; Effect Size; Reading Aloud to Others; Group Testing; Multilingual Materials; Mathematics Tests; Science Tests; National Competency Tests; Grade 3; Grade 4; Grade 5; Grade 6; Grade 7; Grade 8
Abstract:
This report presents results from a new quantitative synthesis of research on the effectiveness and validity of test accommodations for English language learners (ELLs) taking large-scale assessments. In 2006, the Center on Instruction published a review of the literature on test accommodations for ELLs titled "Practical Guidelines for the Education of English Language Learners: Research-based Recommendations for the Use of Accommodations in Large-Scale Assessments" (Francis, Rivera, Lesaux, Kieffer, & Rivera, 2006). This new publication provides an update to the 2006 report, incorporating evidence from nine studies not previously included and providing updated recommendations for educators and policy-makers. Results drawn from 20 studies (including, in total, more than 33,000 students, of whom more than 9,400 were ELLs) were aggregated using meta-analysis. The studies were primarily conducted using researcher-created tests of mathematics and science with items drawn from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in grades 4 and 8. Drawing on the existing evidence, the authors suggest the following recommendations, ordered by the strength of the available evidence: (1) Use simplified English in test design, eliminating irrelevant language demands for all students; (2) Provide English dictionaries/glossaries to ELLs; (3) Match the language of tests and accommodations to the language of instruction; and (4) Provide extended time to ELLs or use untimed tests for all students. Appended are: (1) Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis on effectiveness of accommodations; (2) Comparisons of included studies to those included in Francis et al. (2006) and Pennock-Roman (2011) with reasons for inclusion for newly added studies since Francis et al. (2006); (3) Discussion of the choice of unit of analysis; and (4) Reporting of technical results. (Contains 3 tables and 3 footnotes.) [For related reports, see "Research-Based Recommendations for Instruction and Academic Interventions. Practical Guidelines for the Education of English Language Learners. Book 1 of 3" (ED517790); "Research-Based Recommendations for Serving Adolescent Newcomers. Practical Guidelines for the Education of English Language Learners. Book 2 of 3" (ED517791); and "Research-Based Recommendations for the Use of Accommodations in Large-Scale Assessments. Practical Guidelines for the Education of English Language Learners. Book 3 of 3" (ED517792).]
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (398K)
|
|
