Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

EJ967040 - Moderating Factors of Video-Modeling with Other as Model: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Studies

Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results  permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:EJ967040
Title:Moderating Factors of Video-Modeling with Other as Model: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Studies
Authors:Mason, Rose A.Ganz, Jennifer B.Parker, Richard I.Burke, Mack D.Camargo, Siglia P.
Descriptors:Modeling (Psychology)Video TechnologyAutismPervasive Developmental DisordersDevelopmental DisabilitiesMeta AnalysisProgram EffectivenessParticipant CharacteristicsCase Studies
Source:Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, v33 n4 p1076-1086 Jul-Aug 2012
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com
Publication Date:2012-00-00
Pages:11
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Abstract:Video modeling with other as model (VMO) is a more practical method for implementing video-based modeling techniques, such as video self-modeling, which requires significantly more editing. Despite this, identification of contextual factors such as participant characteristics and targeted outcomes that moderate the effectiveness of VMO has not previously been explored. The purpose of this study was to meta-analytically evaluate the evidence base of VMO with individuals with disabilities to determine if participant characteristics and targeted outcomes moderate the effectiveness of the intervention. Findings indicate that VMO is highly effective for participants with autism spectrum disorder (IRD = 0.83) and moderately effective for participants with developmental disabilities (IRD = 0.68). However, differential effects are indicated across levels of moderators for diagnoses and targeted outcomes. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. (Contains 3 figures and 1 table.)
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:0

Note:N/A
Identifiers:N/A
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0891-4222
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:N/A
Direct Link:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.01.016
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский