Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

EJ931755 - Impact of School Finance Reform on Resource Equalization and Academic Performance: Evidence from Michigan

Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results  permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:EJ931755
Title:Impact of School Finance Reform on Resource Equalization and Academic Performance: Evidence from Michigan
Authors:Roy, Joydeep
Descriptors:EvidenceEducational ObjectivesState AidFinance ReformEducational FinanceOutcomes of EducationAcademic AchievementEqualization AidEducational Equity (Finance)Educational PolicyPolicy AnalysisProgram EvaluationResource AllocationSchool Districts
Source:Education Finance and Policy, v6 n2 p137-167 Spr 2011
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:MIT Press. 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. Tel: 617-253-2889; Fax: 617-253-1709; e-mail: journals-rights@mit.edu; Web site: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/edfp
Publication Date:2011-00-00
Pages:31
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Abstract:Michigan radically altered its school finance system in 1994. The new plan, called Proposal A, significantly increased state aid to the lowest-spending school districts and limited future increases in spending in the highest-spending ones, abolishing local discretion over school spending. I investigate the impact of Proposal A on the distribution of resources and educational outcomes. I analyze the differential effects on the lowest-spending and the highest-spending districts, highlighting the role of local discretion, which has so far been neglected in the literature. I also provide important evidence on the effect of spending on academic performance. Proposal A was quite successful in reducing interdistrict spending disparities. There was also a significant positive effect on student performance in the lowest-spending districts as measured in state tests. However, the constraints on future increases in spending may have had a negative effect on student performance in the highest-spending districts. (Contains 10 tables, 4 figures, and 40 footnotes.)
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:22

Note:N/A
Identifiers:Michigan; Impact Evaluation
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-1557-3060
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Elementary Secondary Education
Direct Link:http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00030
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский