Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

ED392829 - Assessment Plan for CNU Online.

Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results  permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

PDF ERIC Full Text (1509K)

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:ED392829
Title:Assessment Plan for CNU Online.
Authors:Ridley, Dennis R.;  And Others
Descriptors:Computer Assisted InstructionComputer Managed InstructionCourse EvaluationEducational AssessmentEducational ObjectivesEducational PlanningEvaluation MethodsHigher EducationInstructional EffectivenessLearningOnline CoursesOnline SystemsOutcomes of EducationStudent AttitudesSurveysTeacher Effectiveness
Source:N/A
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Publisher:N/A
Publication Date:1995-01-14
Pages:21
Pub Types:Reports - Descriptive; Tests/Questionnaires
Abstract:CNU Online is the computer-managed instructional delivery system of Christopher Newport University. Fully functioning to deliver wholly online courses since fall 1994, CNU Online has been using an officially approved assessment plan since January 1995. The plan is presented as a useful example for others developing online instructional delivery. The goal of the plan is to provide evidence of effectiveness in meeting the goals of CNU Online by using accepted standards of assessment that are consistent with state and regional guidelines. CNU Online must meet the defined state and regional standards for all on-campus programs with regard to assessment goals and quality. The levels of assessment include: (1) online program and institutional efficiency; (2) learning outcomes; (3) teaching effectiveness; and (4) student satisfaction with course delivery. Goals are defined for each of these areas, and methods for evaluation are outlined. These include standard surveys and more innovative approaches to evaluation. Some collateral assessment activities are suggested. Appendixes present an instructional evaluation survey, and a rating scale for peer group-based juried review of aspects of instructors' message logs. (SLD)
Abstractor:N/A
Reference Count:N/A

Note:N/A
Identifiers:Christopher Newport University VA
Record Type:Non-Journal
Level:1 - Available on microfiche
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:N/A
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Higher Education
Direct Link:
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский