Whose Is the Fallacy? A Rejoinder to Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky.

Alert:

Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

Help

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help With This Page

More Info:
Help 0 items in My Clipboard | Add record to My Clipboard

Record Details - EJ222669

Title: Whose Is the Fallacy? A Rejoinder to Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky.

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial Help Finding Full Text

Related Items: Show Related Items

Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
Title:	Whose Is the Fallacy? A Rejoinder to Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky.
Authors:	Cohen, L. Jonathan
Descriptors:	Abstract Reasoning; Deduction; Hypothesis Testing; Logical Thinking; Models; Probability
Source:	Cognition, v8 n1 p89-92 Mar 1980
More Info: Help Peer Reviewed:	Yes
Publisher:	N/A
Publication Date:	1980-03-00
Pages:	N/A
Pub Types:	Journal Articles; Opinion Papers
Abstract:	Kahneman and Tversky's critique of Cohen's position on adults' probability reasoning is not valid. If they think Baconian logic is normatively unsound, the onus is on them to explain why. It is valid and useful because nature itself is full of causal processes. (Author/RD)
Abstractor:	N/A
Reference Count:	0

Note:	N/A
Identifiers:	N/A
Record Type:	Journal
Level:	N/A
Institutions:	N/A
Sponsors:	N/A
ISBN:	N/A
ISSN:	N/A
Audiences:	N/A
Languages:	English
Education Level:	N/A