On the Psychology of Prediction: Whose Is the Fallacy?.

Alert:

Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

Help

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help With This Page

More Info:
Help 0 items in My Clipboard | Add record to My Clipboard

Record Details - EJ218689

Title: On the Psychology of Prediction: Whose Is the Fallacy?

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial Help Finding Full Text

Related Items: Show Related Items

Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
Title:	On the Psychology of Prediction: Whose Is the Fallacy?
Authors:	Cohen, L. Jonathan
Descriptors:	Abstract Reasoning; Cognitive Processes; Higher Education; Logical Thinking; Mathematical Formulas; Prediction; Probability; Reliability; Research Problems; Research Reviews (Publications); Sampling
Source:	Cognition, v7 n4 p385-407 Dec 1979
More Info: Help Peer Reviewed:	Yes
Publisher:	N/A
Publication Date:	1979-12-00
Pages:	N/A
Pub Types:	Journal Articles; Information Analyses
Abstract:	Until recently, norms of experimental reasoning have lacked systematic theoretical development. Thus, it has been easy for psychologists like Tversky and Kahneman to misclassify certain human reasoning processes as being Pascalian and invalid, rather than as being Baconian and valid. (CP)
Abstractor:	N/A
Reference Count:	0

Note:	N/A
Identifiers:	Pascal (Blaise)
Record Type:	Journal
Level:	N/A
Institutions:	N/A
Sponsors:	N/A
ISBN:	N/A
ISSN:	N/A
Audiences:	N/A
Languages:	English
Education Level:	Higher Education