Three Approaches to Educational Planning. A Review and Appraisal of the Demand-for-Places, Manpower-Requirements, and Rate-of-Return Approaches to Educational Planning.

Webster, Maureen M.

Alert:

Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

Help

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help With This Page

Back to Search Results Help Permalink Share this record

More Info:
Help 0 items in My Clipboard | Add record to My Clipboard

Record Details - ED044769

Title: Three Approaches to Educational Planning. A Review and Appraisal of the Demand-for-Places, Manpower-Requirements, and Rate-of-Return Approaches to Educational Planning.

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial Help Finding Full Text

Related Items: Show Related Items

Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
Title:	Three Approaches to Educational Planning. A Review and Appraisal of the Demand-for-Places, Manpower-Requirements, and Rate-of-Return Approaches to Educational Planning.
Authors:	Webster, Maureen M.
Descriptors:	Cost Estimates; Educational Benefits; Educational Demand; Educational Economics; Educational Planning; Educational Supply; Employment Projections; Enrollment Influences; Labor Needs; Labor Supply; Labor Utilization; Population Growth; Program Budgeting; Program Costs; Social Influences; Social Mobility; Unit Costs
Source:	N/A
More Info: Help Peer Reviewed:
Publisher:	N/A
Publication Date:	1970-03-00
Pages:	88
Pub Types:	N/A
Abstract:	This report seeks to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of three approaches to educational planning, and suggests that an eclectic approach is necessary to deal successfully with the problems and prospects of future planning. Each approach is examined to determine its methodology, its alleged shortcomings, and its application in selected planning situations. The approaches are then reviewed to synthesize a more adequate and comprehensive approach to planning. It is concluded that the three approaches should be viewed as complementary rather than as discrete alternatives, but that, even when taken together, they fail to constitute an adequate basis for planning. Much empirical research remains to be done to develop methodologies and theoretical bases for educational planning. (Tables II and IV may reproduce poorly in hard copy because of marginal legibility.) (JF)
Abstractor:	N/A
Reference Count:	N/A

Note:	N/A
Identifiers:	N/A
Record Type:	Non-Journal
Level:	1 - Available on microfiche
Institutions:	Syracuse Univ., NY.
Sponsors:	N/A
ISBN:	N/A
ISSN:	N/A
Audiences:	N/A
Languages:	N/A
Education Level:	N/A

Back to Search Results