ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation

EJ767059 - Gaps between Knowing and Doing: Understanding and Assessing the Barriers to Optimal Health Care

Help Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page
Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's Web Site

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:EJ767059
Title:Gaps between Knowing and Doing: Understanding and Assessing the Barriers to Optimal Health Care
Authors:Cochrane, Lorna J.Olson, Curtis A.Murray, SuzanneDupuis, MartinTooman, TriciaHayes, Sean
Descriptors:Research MethodologyMedical ServicesLiterature ReviewsAccess to Health CareTheory Practice RelationshipMedical ResearchProblems
Source:Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, v27 n2 p94-102 Spr 2007
More Info:
Help
Peer-Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Subscription Department, 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774. Tel: 800-825-7550; Tel: 201-748-6645; Fax: 201-748-6021; e-mail: subinfo@wiley.com; Web site: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/browse/?type=JOURNAL
Publication Date:2007-00-00
Pages:9
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Abstract:Introduction: A significant gap exists between science and clinical practice guidelines, on the one hand, and actual clinical practice, on the other. An in-depth understanding of the barriers and incentives contributing to the gap can lead to interventions that effect change toward optimal practice and thus to better care. Methods: A systematic review of English language studies involving human subjects and published from January 1998 to March 2007 yielded 256 articles that fulfilled established criteria. The analysis was guided by two research questions: How are barriers are assessed? and What types of barriers are identified? The studies abstracted were coded according to 33 emerging themes; placed into seven categories that typified the barriers; grouped as to whether they involved the health care professional, the guideline, the scientific evidence, the patient, or the health system; and organized according to relationship pattern between barriers. Results: The results expand our understanding of how multiple factors pose barriers to optimal clinical practice. The review reveals increasing numbers of behavioral and system barriers. Quantitative survey type assessments continue to dominate barrier research; however, an increasing number of qualitative and mixed-method study designs have emerged recently. Discussion: The findings establish the evolution of research methodologies and emerging barriers to the translation of knowing to doing. While many studies are methodologically weak, there are indications that designs are becoming more aligned with the complexity of the health care environment. The review provides support for the need to examine multiple factors within the knowledge-to-action process.
Abstractor:Author
Reference Count:0

Note:N/A
Identifiers:N/A
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0894-1912
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:N/A
 

ERIC Home