ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation

EJ749338 - Case 1. "Qi Yuling v. Chen Xiaoqi et al.": Opinion by the Higher People's Court of Shandong Province

Help Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page
Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's Web Site

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:EJ749338
Title:Case 1. "Qi Yuling v. Chen Xiaoqi et al.": Opinion by the Higher People's Court of Shandong Province
Authors:N/A
Descriptors:Court LitigationForeign CountriesBusiness EducationStudent RightsCivil RightsDeceptionCollege Entrance ExaminationsVocational EducationLegislationLegal ResponsibilityScoresVictims of Crime
Source:Chinese Education & Society, v39 n4 p60-74 Jul-Aug 2006
More Info:
Help
Peer-Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:M. E. Sharpe, Inc. 80 Business Park Drive, Armonk, NY 10504. Tel: 800-541-6563; Fax: 914-273-2106; e-mail: info@mesharpe.com; Web site: http://www.mesharpe.com
Publication Date:2006-00-00
Pages:15
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Abstract:This article presents the details of Qi Yuling v. Chen Xiaoqi et al case. The plaintiff Qi Yuling filed a lawsuit at the Intermediate People's Court in Zaozhuang, Shandong against defendants Chen Xiaoqi, Chen Kezheng, Jining Business School in Shandong ("Jining Business School"), the Eighth Middle School of Tengzhou, Shandong ("Tengzhou Eighth Middle School"), and the Education Committee of Tengzhou, Shandong ("Tengzhou Education Committee") over a dispute involving infringement of the right to one's name and the right to education. After taking the unified entrance exam, the plaintiff Qi Yuling was accepted by Jining Business School as a new student in finance and accounting in 1990. Because of the fraudulent act committed by all the defendants named in this case, defendant Chen Xiaoqi was able to get into Jining Business School using the plaintiff's name. It violated the plaintiff's right to her own name and her right to education. As a result, the plaintiff requests that such infringement be stopped and that she be paid 160,000 yuan for economic losses. The decision of the Higher People's Court of Shandong Province is provided in this article.
Abstractor:ERIC
Reference Count:0

Note:N/A
Identifiers:China; Right to Education
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-1061-1932
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:N/A
 

ERIC Home