ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation

ED451253 - Rewarding Shared Experience: Assessing Individual Contributions to Team-Based Work.

Help Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page
Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

PDF ERIC Full Text (209K)

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:ED451253
Title:Rewarding Shared Experience: Assessing Individual Contributions to Team-Based Work.
Authors:Bastick, Tony
Descriptors:AccountabilityAdult StudentsContinuing EducationCooperative LearningCriteriaEvaluation MethodsGroup ActivitiesGroup MembershipReliabilityStudent EvaluationStudent ParticipationValidity
Source:N/A
More Info:
Help
Peer-Reviewed:
N/A
Publisher:N/A
Publication Date:1999-10-00
Pages:9
Pub Types:Reports - Research; Speeches/Meeting Papers
Abstract:Continuing education students are usually mature students who have a wealth of experience from which their peers and the lecturer could profit. An effective teaching method with such students is the use of cooperative work assignments, but a problem that prevents lecturers from using this method is the difficulty of assigning grades to individual students for their collaborative group work. This paper describes an effective assessment procedure that puts individual accountability into the assessment of cooperative assignments so that students are fairly rewarded for sharing their experience. The technique, which involves peer evaluations of each member's contributions to the work, was tested with 57 undergraduate and graduate students in 8 cooperative groups. Students were asked to evaluate the contributions of each member of the group to the project, but the project grade was assessed without regard to these ratings. The variation in the marks received by a group member were used as a measure of the reliability of the member's grade, and the reasons given for each of the peer evaluations served as indications of the construct validity of the group member's mark. The peer assessments were used in combination with the group mark to award a grade to each participant. Results from the study support the use of the technique in assessing the contributions of each group member. (Contains 2 tables and 18 references.) (SLD)
Abstractor:N/A
Reference Count:N/A

Note:Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association for Continuing Education and Training (Fort Lauderdale, FL, October 1999). For related papers, see TM 032 456, TM 032 460, and TM 032 479.
Identifiers:N/A
Record Type:Non-Journal
Level:1 - Available on microfiche
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:N/A
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:N/A
 

ERIC Home