ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation

EJ733145 - Attitudes toward Women's Body Hair: Relationship with Disgust Sensitivity

Help Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page
Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's Web Site

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:EJ733145
Title:Attitudes toward Women's Body Hair: Relationship with Disgust Sensitivity
Authors:Tiggemann, MarikaLewis, Christine
Descriptors:Self ConceptPsychological PatternsUndergraduate StudentsQuestionnairesSexual IdentityHuman BodyInterpersonal AttractionBehavior StandardsAttitude MeasuresNormsGender IssuesNegative AttitudesHygiene
Source:Psychology of Women Quarterly, v28 n4 p381-387 Dec 2004
More Info:
Help
Peer-Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:Blackwell Publishing. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8599; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: customerservices@blackwellpublishing.com; Web site: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/jnl_default.asp.
Publication Date:2004-12-00
Pages:7
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Abstract:We aimed to further investigate the "hairlessness" norm that is the common practice of body hair removal among women. A sample of 198 undergraduate students (91 men, 107 women) completed questionnaires asking about attitudes toward women's body hair and the reasons women remove this hair, as well as a measure of disgust sensitivity. It was found that the vast majority (98%) of female participants regularly remove their leg and/or underarm hair, most frequently by shaving, and attribute this to femininity and attractiveness reasons. However, the attributions that they and men made for other women were much more socially normative in nature. For the sample as a whole, negative attitudes toward body hair were related to disgust sensitivity. It was concluded that body hair on women, but not on men, has become an elicitor of disgust and its removal correspondingly normative.
Abstractor:Author
Reference Count:20

Note:N/A
Identifiers:N/A
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0361-6843
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Higher Education
 

Back to Search Results