Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 21 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 45 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 102 |
Descriptor
| Higher Education | 169 |
| Writing Laboratories | 169 |
| Writing Instruction | 131 |
| Tutoring | 75 |
| Tutors | 66 |
| Writing (Composition) | 50 |
| Laboratories | 41 |
| Writing Research | 31 |
| Peer Teaching | 30 |
| Teacher Student Relationship | 29 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Writing Center Journal | 222 |
Author
| Severino, Carol | 6 |
| Carino, Peter | 4 |
| Ede, Lisa | 4 |
| Harris, Muriel | 4 |
| Trimbur, John | 4 |
| Bishop, Wendy | 3 |
| Denny, Harry | 3 |
| Dinitz, Sue | 3 |
| Grimm, Nancy | 3 |
| Kiedaisch, Jean | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 30 |
| Postsecondary Education | 7 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing 61 to 75 of 222 results
Peer reviewedCarino, Peter; Enders, Doug – Writing Center Journal, 2001
Presents a correlation study of student satisfaction with Writing Center services based on the number of visits students made to the Center during two different semesters. Tells a story of how the writing center staff learned to stop fearing numbers and love the interpretation of them. Finds no statistically significant correlation between number…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Research Methodology, Statistical Analysis, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewedBell, James H. – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Suggests that writing centers should conduct more sophisticated evaluations, and should turn to educational program evaluation and select general types of evaluations most appropriate for writing centers. Presents an evaluation which exemplifies and clarifies what is called for in the first half of the article. (SC)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Higher Education, Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedLerner, Neal – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Presents a statement of "professional concerns," to echo Jeanne Simpson's exploration of beginning a writing center. Presents the story of the author's first year as one way of reading the factors that both constrain and enable educators to reach levels of professional status that ensure security and stability, both for educators personally and…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Higher Education, Professional Development, Program Development
Peer reviewedInman, James A. – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Suggests that all stakeholders should share a focus on "innovations," referring here simultaneously to technologies and their social, cultural, political, and historical contexts. Introduces a new perspective through which writing center professionals can approach collaborative relationships with other stakeholders in the move towards…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Instructional Innovation, Program Development, Teacher Collaboration
Peer reviewedYoung, Beth Rapp; Dziuban, Emily – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Addresses two kinds of writers: (1) writers who seem to want approval more than feedback; and (2) writers who refuse to do all but the bare minimum. Presents several strategies to address these writers and notes that these strategies can help educators critically examine their beliefs about what a Writing Center should accomplish. (SC)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Instructional Improvement, Motivation, Program Development
Peer reviewedBrannon, Lil; North, Stephen M. – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Discusses concerns surrounding the future of writing centers. Claims that although most institutions have writing centers, they are generally underfunded, the staff is comprised of underpaid student workers, and the centers are not institutionally viable. (NH)
Descriptors: Educational Finance, Educational Objectives, Higher Education, Tutorial Programs
Peer reviewedHarris, Muriel – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Considers the nature of today's changing society in order to determine how writing centers can continue to be viable parts of academia. Discusses issues such as helping students integrate technology into their writing processes, and present and future demographic changes. (NH)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Educational Responsibility, Higher Education, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewedKinkead, Joyce; Harris, Jeanette – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Claims writing centers of the future will be more reliant on technology, need more second-language acquisition specialists, expand beyond the physical boundaries of a single center, and assume a more prominent role in research. (NH)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Educational Research, English (Second Language), Higher Education
Peer reviewedKail, Harvey – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Argues that the challenge for writing centers to continue to be viable lies not so much in responding to changing educational demands as to continuing to meet the ongoing demand for competent writing in the academy. (NH)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Financial Needs, Higher Education, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewedTrimbur, John – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Draws on experience at Worcester Polytechnic Institute to argue that recent trends in writing center theory and practice see literacy as a multimodal activity in which oral, written, and visual communication intertwine and interact. (NH)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Literacy, Speech Communication, Writing Laboratories
Peer reviewedEde, Lisa; Lunsford, Andrea – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Discusses opportunities available to writing centers involving four potentials for institutional refiguration: (1) institutional space; (2) knowledge production and intellectual property; (3) research paradigms and rewards; (4) and budget allocations. (NH)
Descriptors: Budgeting, Cooperation, Higher Education, Individualized Instruction
Peer reviewedDeShaw, Dana; Mullin, Joan; DeCiccio, Albert C. – Writing Center Journal, 2000
Presents an annotated bibliography tracing 20 years of "Writing Center Journal" scholarship covering a variety of issues which include teacher training, critical thinking, writing apprehension, peer tutoring, Internet sources and individual instruction. Contains annotations of all the articles and reviews published in this journal's first 20…
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Critical Thinking, Higher Education, Individual Instruction
Peer reviewedCogie, Jane; Strain, Kim; Lorinskas, Sharon – Writing Center Journal, 1999
Describes how one writing center with many English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) students has integrated the "cultural informant" role of tutors with their role of teaching self-editing strategies. Reviews the process of introducing ESL students to use of a learner's dictionary, minimal marking, and error logs. Offers examples of using these…
Descriptors: Class Activities, English (Second Language), Error Correction, Higher Education
Peer reviewedTipper, Margaret O. – Writing Center Journal, 1999
Offers an analysis of the ways in which the structure and practice of writing centers may be uncomfortable, difficult, even anathema to many boys and young men. Describes ways the author's writing center at a boys' school has changed some of its practices in an attempt to address this issue. (SR)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Males, Secondary Education, Sex Fairness
Peer reviewedBawarshi, Anis; Pelkowski, Stephanie – Writing Center Journal, 1999
Argues that the writing center is an ideal place to teach and practice a critical and self-reflective form of acculturation, encouraging underprepared students (especially those marginalized by race, class, and ethnicity) to adopt critical consciousness. Discusses acculturation verses the goals of critical consciousness, the traditional writing…
Descriptors: Acculturation, Basic Writing, Critical Thinking, Educationally Disadvantaged


