Evaluates several views of the relationship between computers and education, and criticizes the use of artificial intelligence and natural language processing software for evaluating student writing. Recommends utilizing programs that use heuristic methods to ask students a series of questions to help them organize and compose papers. (SKC)

Concentrates on reviewing literature on the use of computers to assist the composing process and the teaching of composing in the writing center. Deals with the following categories of software: (1) general, (2) prewriting, (3) organizing, (4) drafting, (5) revising, and (6) proofreading/copy editing. (SKC)

Describes how the Writing Lab at Hazelwood West High School, in Missouri, was designed and initiated. Reveals that computers are used there: (1) in teaching whole classes, (2) with individual students, (3) to teach skills, and (4) for keeping records. (SKC)

Describes an informal study of the relationship between peer tutors and writers in a college writing lab. Notes that while working with the computer, the varying social, ethnic, and educational backgrounds of the participants vanish and a new relationship develops. (SKC)

Shows the advantages of using word processors in freshman composition classes that use the instructional technique of peer evaluation. Points out that the benefits are practical for both evaluators and composers, and suggests how to implement a computerized peer evaluation system. (SKC)

Lists recently published scholarship of interest to those who administer, work in, or make use of writing centers. (SKC)

Examines the divided subjectivities of a Navajo student and her African-American writing tutor. (PRA)

Asserts that the most ambitious goal of writing centers is to validate cultural differences while helping students who feel alienated to develop a critical consciousness toward their own place in the university and the wider mainstream culture. Argues that tutors must make special efforts to help students formulate arguments when they question…

Discusses how an art student with mild learning disabilities developed a technique (with her writing center tutor) of rewriting her papers in layers, both vertically and laterally, building her meaning like a painting. (PRA)

Argues for the importance of letting students bring their own literacy networks into the writing center. Describes the benefits of social and cultural interaction between students and their tutors. (PRA)

Uses Frankenstein's monster as an analogy for understanding the relationship of student, teacher, and literary work in an academic community, and the difficult role of the tutor in helping to make the relationship work. (PRA)

Suggests pushing students to explore their own knowledge of and instincts about their experiences as they write to any audience. Discusses the "when,""where," and "how" of revision. Discusses limiting scope and focus, adding dialogue and interviews, switching point of view and voice, and transforming research papers and narrative. (PRA)

Reexamines the author's 1984 essay "The Idea of a Writing Center." Revisits in particular three relationships: the tutor and the writer; the tutor and the teacher; and the tutor and the institution. (SR)

Argues that the pursuit of success and stability, as conventionally measured, may be the undoing of writing centers. Reviews the history of three groups now firmly established in the university (American Literature, literary theory, and composition studies) whose power and status were purchased at great price. (SR)

Argues that one productive approach to writing tutorials is to conceive them as performances and to encourage tutors to analyze them in this way. Analyzes tape-recorded narratives from tutors about conference experiences, which raise questions about the very nature of peer tutoring and help tutors clarify their roles. (SR)