NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing all 14 results
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, 2010
For the past two decades, lawmakers from both parties in Ohio have invested heavily in the public education sector. As a consequence, total K-12 education funding, measured in constant dollars, has grown by over 60 percent since 1997, even as Ohio's K-12 student enrollment has shrunk by more than 24,000 students (1.4 percent) during that same…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Academic Standards, Educational Policy, Economic Impact
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, 2006
This report is the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation's first ever comprehensive analysis of education reform and results in the 50 states. For each of them, this report examines: (1) student achievement, with a focus on poor and minority students; (2) achievement trends since the early 1990s for these same students; and (3) reform efforts centering on…
Descriptors: School Choice, Achievement Gains, Economically Disadvantaged, Academic Achievement
Yecke, Cheri Pierson – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, 2005
The author defines "middle schoolism" as "an approach to educating children in the middle grades (usually grades 5-8), popularized in the latter half of the 20th century, that contributed to a precipitous decline in academic achievement among American early adolescents." She argues that many middle schools are on the right path, but those that…
Descriptors: Middle Schools, Educational Quality, Educational Improvement, Academic Achievement
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2006
Education funding today is a mess, and a solution is needed that addresses its biggest problems: most disadvantaged students do not receive the funding they need; red tape and overhead waste time and money; and new types of education options, like charter schools, are starved for dollars. Unfortunately, until now, so-called solutions have…
Descriptors: Educational Finance, Educational Equity (Finance), Public Schools, School Choice
Palmer, Louann Bierlein; Terrell, Michelle Godard; Hassel, Bryan C.; Svahn, C. Peter – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2006
At the request of Ohio's top government and education leaders, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, National Association of Charter School Authorizers, and National Alliance for Public Charter Schools have issued a report seeking to strengthen the state's charter school program. Among its 17 recommendations are calls for closing low-performing charter…
Descriptors: Educational Equity (Finance), Quality Control, Charter Schools, Educational Policy
Farkas, Steve; Duffett, Ann – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
These are critical times for Ohio's system of educating its young people. Initiatives to reform the public schools have been gaining momentum for some time. Elected officials, organized interest groups, think tanks, and civic leaders are tugging and pulling at the system, trying to move it this way or that. But where do the people of Ohio--the…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Educational Vouchers, Charter Schools, Public Education
Gross, Paul R. – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
The mission of this review is to appraise the new draft NAEP science framework and to determine whether it is up to snuff. This is an evaluation of the September 30, 2005, draft document, Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (Framework), developed for the National Assessment Governing Board. The criteria is…
Descriptors: Governing Boards, National Competency Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Science Instruction
Carpenter, Dick M., II – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
This report contains the typology of charter schools that were sought, based on Carpenter's careful sorting of 1,182 charter schools, representing 87 percent of all those operating in 2001-2002 in the five states (Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan, and Texas) that then accounted for the lion's share of U.S. charter schools. Carpenter sorted…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, Classification, Enrollment, Student Diversity
Gross, Paul R. – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
Until now, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) has focused everyone's attention on reading and math--and on whether schools are making "adequate yearly progress" in those two core subjects. Although some states incorporate additional subjects into their own accountability systems, reading and math have dominated most discussions of state…
Descriptors: State Standards, Science Education, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement
Brady, Ronald C. – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, 2003
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) requires states and school districts to act aggressively to turn around failing schools. NCLB lists 31 different interventions of varying degrees of severity that are available to state and local policymakers when faced with schools whose students fail to make sufficient academic progress and sets forth…
Descriptors: School Restructuring, Intervention, Federal Legislation, Academic Achievement
Stotsky, Sandra – Thomas B Fordham Foundation and Institute, 2005
The importance of state academic standards soared in January 2002 with passage of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Not only does that milestone law require all states to have demanding academic standards in place and to demonstrate steady student progress toward academic proficiency as set forth in those standards, it also links states'…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Reading Achievement, Educational Policy
Finn, Chester E., Jr.; Ryan, Terry – Thomas B Fordham Foundation and Institute, 2005
This report presents the testimony of the president and program director of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Based in Washington, DC and in Dayton, the Institute is a nonprofit organization that supports research, publications, and action projects of national significance in elementary/secondary reform, as well as significant education reform…
Descriptors: Public Education, Educational Change, School Choice, Educational Quality
Doyle, Denis P.; Diepold, Brian; DeSchryver, David A. – Thomas B Fordham Foundation and Institute, 2004
Does it matter where public-school teachers send their own children to school? If so, how and why? What can we learn from them? What we are grappling with here is the question of connoisseurship. Stock analysts, for example, watch carefully when corporate directors buy or sell the stock of companies on whose boards they serve. Similarly, we can…
Descriptors: Public School Teachers, Public Schools, Educational Change, Private Schools
Ryan, Terry – Thomas B Fordham Foundation and Institute, 2004
Are charter school students in Dayton learning more than students in traditional district schools? You might be surprised to find that the answer is "yes," though there is still tremendous room for improvement on both sides. This analysis takes Ohio's 2004 School Report Card data from the state Department of Education and compares them with 2003…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Charter Schools, Public Schools, School Effectiveness