Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Scores | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Educational Improvement | 1 |
| Engineering | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| Governing Boards | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Gross, Paul R. | 2 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Showing all 2 results
Download full textGross, Paul R. – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
The mission of this review is to appraise the new draft NAEP science framework and to determine whether it is up to snuff. This is an evaluation of the September 30, 2005, draft document, Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (Framework), developed for the National Assessment Governing Board. The criteria is…
Descriptors: Governing Boards, National Competency Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Science Instruction
Gross, Paul R. – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
Until now, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) has focused everyone's attention on reading and math--and on whether schools are making "adequate yearly progress" in those two core subjects. Although some states incorporate additional subjects into their own accountability systems, reading and math have dominated most discussions of state…
Descriptors: State Standards, Science Education, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement
