A comparison of faculty and student evaluation of an instructor-rating questionnaire at Northampton County Area Community College, Pennsylvania, is the subject of this report. Students and faculty members were asked to specify the relative importance of 12 given areas considered in instructor evaluation, and then to suggest scores between 10 and zero for both a theoretically excellent and poor teacher in each of the 12 areas. The comparison of responses suggests that: a highly positive correlation exists between each group's rating of the areas; the areas are not considered as having equal importance; and the mean ratings of students indicating scores for the excellent and poor teacher in each area were consistently higher than those given by the faculty. [Not available in hard copy due to marginal legibility of original document.] (JO)