Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 4 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Teacher Evaluation | 4 |
| Academic Achievement | 3 |
| Teacher Effectiveness | 3 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| School Culture | 2 |
| School Districts | 2 |
| Teacher Persistence | 2 |
| Teaching (Occupation) | 2 |
| Urban Schools | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| TNTP | 4 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
Showing all 4 results
TNTP, 2012
In "The Irreplaceables," TNTP researchers argued that America's urban schools take a negligent approach to teacher retention, losing too many of their very best teachers--their "Irreplaceables"--and keeping too many of their weakest teachers, year after year. A combination of weak school leadership, poor working conditions and restrictive policies…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Educational Change, Instructional Leadership, Urban Schools
TNTP, 2012
There is no shortage of research on the importance of good teaching. For decades, study after study has shown that there are large differences in effectiveness from one teacher to another and that these differences can have a lifelong impact on students. A recent study that tracked 2.5 million students over 20 years determined that those with…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Teacher Effectiveness, Teacher Evaluation, Program Effectiveness
Jacob, Andy; Vidyarthi, Elizabeth; Carroll, Kathleen – TNTP, 2012
"Irreplaceables" are teachers who are so successful they are nearly impossible to replace, but who too often vanish from schools as the result of neglect and inattention. To identify and better understand the experience of these teachers, the authors started by studying 90,000 teachers across four large, geographically diverse urban school…
Descriptors: Urban Schools, Teaching (Occupation), Teacher Effectiveness, Teacher Persistence
TNTP, 2011
This paper presents myths as well as facts about value-added analysis. These myths include: (1) "Value-added isn't fair to teachers who work in high-need schools, where students tend to lag far behind academically"; (2) "Value-added scores are too volatile from year-to-year to be trusted"; (3) "There's no research behind value-added"; (4) "Using…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Standardized Tests, Teacher Evaluation, Evaluation Methods


