Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 4 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Faculty Development | 2 |
| Goal Orientation | 2 |
| Teacher Effectiveness | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Achievement Gap | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Competition | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Educational Quality | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| TNTP | 4 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Audience
Showing all 4 results
Fishman, Shira; Henderson, Whitney; Irish, Jamie; Lyons, Katie; Ross, Leslie – TNTP, 2012
Founded by TNTP, the Fishman Prize for Superlative Classroom Practice is an annual award for the nation's best teachers in high-poverty public schools. The goal is to shine a spotlight on great teaching and amplify the voices of some of the nation's best educators so that others can gain insight into their remarkable classrooms. No more than five…
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Teacher Effectiveness, Learner Engagement, Mathematics Instruction
TNTP, 2012
This paper presents five ways principals can keep more irreplaceable teachers. These tips are: (1) Start the school year with great expectations; (2) Recognize excellence publicly and frequently; (3) Treat your irreplaceables like they are irreplaceable; (4) Start having "stay conversations" by Thanksgiving; and (5) Hold the line on good teaching.…
Descriptors: Principals, Urban Schools, School Culture, Institutional Characteristics
TNTP, 2011
A vast gulf in academic achievement separates public schools in Washington, D.C.'s poorest neighborhoods from those in its most affluent. Achievement Prep, which serves 4th-8th graders in D.C.'s impoverished 8th Ward, is an outlier. Yet in 2011, 60% of Achievement Prep's "scholars" scored proficient or advanced in reading on the DC-CAS tests,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Feedback (Response), Neighborhoods, Public Schools
TNTP, 2011
This paper presents myths as well as facts about value-added analysis. These myths include: (1) "Value-added isn't fair to teachers who work in high-need schools, where students tend to lag far behind academically"; (2) "Value-added scores are too volatile from year-to-year to be trusted"; (3) "There's no research behind value-added"; (4) "Using…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Standardized Tests, Teacher Evaluation, Evaluation Methods


