Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Curriculum Development | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Biology | 2 |
| Curriculum Evaluation | 2 |
| Ethics | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Formative Evaluation | 2 |
| Junior High Schools | 2 |
| Attitudes | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Studies in Educational… | 5 |
Author
| Sabar, Naama | 5 |
| Miron, Mordechai | 1 |
| Shafriri, Nitza | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 5 results
Peer reviewedSabar, Naama – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2002
Explored issues related to student evaluation in higher education through responses of 40 faculty members to a scenario involving the evaluation of a graduate student whose thesis did not meet the teacher's expectations. Findings illuminate the clash between instructors' concerns for their students and the need to evaluate them according to…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Criteria, Ethics, Grades (Scholastic)
Peer reviewedSabar, Naama – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1998
How researchers view the teacher informants with whom they work on studies of educational improvement was examined by placing the researchers themselves in the roles of informants. Responses of approximately 40 researchers show differing attitudes, but the teacher informant was not generally considered a true research partner. (SLD)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Cooperation, Educational Improvement, Educational Research
Peer reviewedSabar, Naama – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1975
The paper shows how various evaluation information, received through a number of feedback sources was used for revisions made in curriculum materials. The value of the results provided by the various evaluation instruments is discussed as well as how each technique validates the outcomes received from the other techniques and illuminates a…
Descriptors: Biology, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedSabar, Naama; Shafriri, Nitza – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1981
The success of any new curriculum depends on an appropriate level of qualified input on the part of many individuals at different stages of the change process. Professional curriculum centers are cited as important agents in the effective implementation of a new program. Workshops in curriculum development are explained. (CE)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Curriculum Study Centers, Educational Strategies, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedSabar, Naama; Miron, Mordechai – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1979
Because workloads frequently do not permit teachers to develop curriculum themselves, their participation in its formative evaluation (field testing) is a productive alternative. A seventh-grade biology program was evaluated by 14 teachers. (CP)
Descriptors: Biology, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation Methods


