Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Test Validity | 5 |
| Elementary Education | 4 |
| Mathematics Achievement | 4 |
| Pervasive Developmental… | 4 |
| Reading Achievement | 4 |
| Screening Tests | 4 |
| Achievement Tests | 3 |
| Autism | 3 |
| Children | 3 |
| Factor Analysis | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Psychology in the Schools | 11 |
Author
| Eaves, Ronald C. | 11 |
| Williams, Thomas O., Jr. | 3 |
| Simpson, Robert G. | 2 |
| Campbell, Hollie A. | 1 |
| Chambers, DaLee | 1 |
| Williams, Thomas Oliver, Jr. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 11 |
| Reports - Research | 7 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 11 results
Eaves, Ronald C.; Williams, Thomas O., Jr. – Psychology in the Schools, 2006
The reliability and construct validity of ratings for the Autism Behavior Checklist were examined with a sample of 198 children diagnosed with autistic disorder and conditions often confused with autism. Alpha coefficients for the five scales of the ABC as well as the Total Score were reported and the factor structure of the ABC was examined…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Test Reliability, Test Validity, Factor Analysis
Williams, Thomas O., Jr.; Eaves, Ronald C. – Psychology in the Schools, 2005
The Pervasive Developmental Disorders Rating Scale (PDDRS; Eaves, 2003) is a rating scale that is used in the screening process for pervasive developmental disorders (PDD). The PDDRS contains three scales: Arousal, Affect, and Cognition. In this study, the construct validity of the PDDRS was examined with teacher ratings from a sample of 168…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Rating Scales, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewedWilliams, Thomas O., Jr.; Eaves, Ronald C. – Psychology in the Schools, 2002
Examines reliability of test scores for the Pervasive Developmental Disorders Rating Scale (PDDRS), a screening instrument used in the assessment of autistic disorder. The results indicated that coefficient alpha for the PDDRS Total Score was adequate for screening purposes for both age groups studied. The results of the test-retest study also…
Descriptors: Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, School Psychology, Screening Tests
Peer reviewedWilliams, Thomas Oliver, Jr.; Eaves, Ronald C. – Psychology in the Schools, 2001
Analyzes the factor structure of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised (WRMT-R) using data from a sample of special education students. Woodcock asserted that the WRMT-R measured two important aspects of reading ability: Basic Skills and Reading Comprehension. Results of the analyses indicated a robust single factor and provided little…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedEaves, Ronald C.; Campbell, Hollie A.; Chambers, DaLee – Psychology in the Schools, 2000
Investigates validity of the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) measuring characteristics of individuals with autism, and the Pervasive Developmental Disorder Rating Scale (PDDRS) measuring pervasive developmental disorders. Results showed both instruments significantly discriminated between participants with autistic disorder and children with…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedEaves, Ronald C.; Simpson, Robert G. – Psychology in the Schools, 1986
Contends that erroneous conclusions concerning intraindividual strengths may result when comparing scaled scores on subtests of The Test of Reading Comprehension. Examination of scaled scores may seem to indicate that a given student has performed better on one subtest than on another when the difference between the two scores is not statistically…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedEaves, Ronald C.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1989
This investigation compared the Peabody Individual Achievement Test and the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test scores of 131 children in grades 1-8, in order to determine whether findings of lower Woodcock scores are equally robust for each level. Differences in validity coefficients decreased from earlier to later grades. (Author/PB)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Concurrent Validity, Elementary Education, Junior High Schools
Peer reviewedEaves, Ronald C.; Simpson, Robert G. – Psychology in the Schools, 1984
Investigated the concurrent validity of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test and the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test in 171 adolescents. The presence of relatively high and positive partial correlations between the scores supported the concurrent validity of the instruments. (JAC)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Adolescents, Mathematics Achievement
Peer reviewedEaves, Ronald C.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1990
Evaluated relationship between Cognitive Levels Test (CLT) and two tests of academic achievement: Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests (WRAT) and KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test (KeyMath). Findings from children in kindergarten through second grade showed CLT to be rather highly correlated with KeyMath scores, modestly correlated with WRAT total…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Mathematics Achievement
Peer reviewedEaves, Ronald C.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1990
Evaluated ability of Cognitive Levels Test (CLT) to estimate current achievement in mathematics (as measured by KeyMath Revised) and reading (as measured by Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised) among 38 private elementary and secondary school students. Validity coefficients indicated that CLT scores were moderately to highly correlated with…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adolescents, Children, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewedEaves, Ronald C.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1994
Study investigated relative merits of using teacher judgment and Slosson Full-Range Intelligence Test (SFRIT) to estimate students' math and reading achievement. Analyses of students enrolled in a remedial-reading program, showed that the SFRIT recovered more variance from the distributions of math and reading tests than did teacher judgment. (RJM)
Descriptors: Children, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests

Direct link
