Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 5 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 31 |
Descriptor
Source
| New Directions for Teaching… | 61 |
Author
| Fink, L. Dee | 6 |
| Centra, John A. | 3 |
| Svinicki, Marilla D. | 3 |
| Aleamoni, Lawrence M. | 2 |
| Angelo, Thomas A. | 2 |
| Donald, Janet G. | 2 |
| Lewis, Karron G. | 2 |
| Menges, Robert J. | 2 |
| Murray, Harry G. | 2 |
| Stevens, Joseph J. | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 61 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 25 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 16 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 10 |
| Information Analyses | 9 |
| Reports - Research | 8 |
| Opinion Papers | 7 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 5 |
| Reference Materials -… | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 15 |
| Teachers | 11 |
| Administrators | 2 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Showing 1 to 15 of 61 results
Schumann, David W.; Peters, John; Olsen, Taimi – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013
The advent of faculty development centers that focus on the improvement of teaching skills and better understanding of student learning concepts dates back to the 1960s. These centers were initiated from a realization that the effectiveness of a faculty member resulted from growth and maturity over time and that certain support systems were…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Stakeholders, Educational Change, Instructional Improvement
Hoessler, Carolyn; Britnell, Judy; Stockley, Denise – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2010
In this article, the authors convey what scholarship of teaching and learning is and is not, and how educational developers can and do engage in such scholarship to grow as individual providers, units, and academic institutions seeking to continue improving teaching and learning. Further, the advancement of effective teaching techniques, expansion…
Descriptors: Educational Development, Teacher Effectiveness, Scholarship, Teaching Methods
Pascarella, Ernest T.; Seifert, Tricia A.; Whitt, Elizabeth J. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008
An extensive body of correlational and experimental evidence has demonstrated the positive (and perhaps causal) link between different dimensions of effective postsecondary classroom instruction and both course-level learning and more general cognitive growth. In this chapter, the authors present evidence from a longitudinal study of first-year…
Descriptors: Academic Persistence, Probability, College Freshmen, Teaching Methods
McCalman, Claudia Ladeira – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2007
During the last two decades an increasing number of international faculty specializing in different disciplines have been hired by U.S. institutions of higher education. Most of these instructors have been college educated in their native countries but have come to the United States for graduate studies and then earned doctoral degrees from U.S.…
Descriptors: Cultural Awareness, Intercultural Communication, Teacher Effectiveness, Student Attitudes
Burgoyne, Suzanne; Placier, Peggy; Thomas, Mallory; Welch, Sharon; Ruffin, Clyde; Flores, Lisa Y.; Celebi, Elif; Azizan-Gardner, Noor; Miller, Marilyn – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2007
Forum theater is an interactive theater method in which audience members become active performers, taking advantage of the opportunity to explore multicultural dimensions of teaching in a "safe space" and receiving feedback from colleagues. Forum theater methods derive from Theater of the Oppressed, an interactive approach founded by the Brazilian…
Descriptors: Theater Arts, Teaching Methods, Audiences, Teacher Effectiveness
Weaver, Barbara E.; Nilson, Linda B. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2005
This chapter describes Clemson University's Laptop Faculty Development Program and its assessment, offering the program as one model for designing faculty development to successfully implement laptop mandates. The chapter also acquaints readers with the many types of in-class, laptop-based activities that meet best-practice criteria for effective…
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Teacher Effectiveness, Computer Uses in Education, Computers
Peer reviewedSvinicki, Marilla D. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Provides suggestions for how faculty can encourage students to take faculty evaluations seriously and to provide thoughtful and constructive criticism. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Higher Education, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Peer reviewedLewis, Karron G. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Discusses written comments by students on faculty evaluations and suggests how faculty can organize them to provide usable feedback to improve their teaching and student learning. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Higher Education, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Peer reviewedLewis, Karron G. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Examines some simple and more complicated ways for faculty to obtain meaningful feedback in the middle of the semester, while there is still time to make changes for the students in that class. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Feedback, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedLieberman, Devorah; Bowers, Nancy; Moore, David R. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Offers suggestions about how faculty can incorporate technology into midsemester student feedback, asserting that it gives students more opportunities to provide input. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Computer Mediated Communication, Higher Education
Peer reviewedSpence, Larry; Lenze, Lisa Firing – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Describes student quality teams as a way to help faculty make the process of getting student feedback more reflective and collaborative. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Groups, Higher Education
Peer reviewedTiberius, Richard – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Describes a streamlined process for using student focus groups to obtain student feedback on faculty and course effectiveness. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Course Evaluation, Focus Groups
Peer reviewedRando, William L. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Offers suggestions for writing student rating scale questions that target individual faculty needs and interests. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Evaluation Needs, Higher Education
Peer reviewedFranklin, Jennifer – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Provides information about how faculty can use the data on their own student ratings to develop a narrative that will help others (such as administrators and the public) understand what the numbers mean and how they should and should not be used. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Data Interpretation, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewedFenwick, Tara J. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Discusses the often difficult process of evaluating teaching effectiveness in terms of student learning outcomes. Suggests approaches for micro- and macro-level teacher evaluation using student outcomes. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Direct link
