Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
| Accountability | 7 |
| College Outcomes Assessment | 7 |
| Educational Policy | 7 |
| Educational Quality | 7 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 7 |
| Government School Relationship | 7 |
| Higher Education | 7 |
| Educational Indicators | 6 |
| Reports | 6 |
| Performance | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for… | 7 |
Author
| Burke, Joseph C. | 7 |
| Minassians, Henrik P. | 7 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 7 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 7 results
Peer reviewedBurke, Joseph C.; Minassians, Henrik P. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
Traces the rise of the "new accountability" in higher education and describes the policy responses of outcomes assessment, performance funding and budgeting, and performance reporting. (EV)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Indicators, Educational Policy
Peer reviewedBurke, Joseph C.; Minassians, Henrik P. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
Examines the coverage, content, and customers of higher education performance reports, along with their purposes, priorities, initiation methods, and emerging changes in their style and substance. (EV)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Indicators, Educational Policy
Peer reviewedBurke, Joseph C.; Minassians, Henrik P. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
The performance types, concerns, policy values, and models of excellence implied in higher education performance reporting indicators are identified, and the use of performance measures by two- and four-year campuses are compared. (EV)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Indicators, Educational Policy
Peer reviewedBurke, Joseph C.; Minassians, Henrik P. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
Summarizes results of an opinion survey of governors' aides, legislative chairs of education committees, higher education finance officers, and campus institutional researchers on the use, effects, and future of performance reporting. (EV)
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Attitudes, College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Indicators
Peer reviewedBurke, Joseph C.; Minassians, Henrik P. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
Provides state and campus policymakers' views on the importance and appropriateness of the most common indicators used in state and campus performance reports. (EV)
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Attitudes, College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Indicators
Peer reviewedBurke, Joseph C.; Minassians, Henrik P. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
Compares the results from the National Center for Public Policy in Higher Education's state report cards and state performance reports, and notes that the states with performance reports received no better grades than those without them. (EV)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Policy, Educational Quality
Peer reviewedBurke, Joseph C.; Minassians, Henrik P. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
Reviews the prospects, problems, and possibilities of performance reporting in higher education and discusses two fundamental flaws in performance reporting. (EV)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Indicators, Educational Policy


