NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing all 4 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Diamond, Robert M. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1976
The Center for Instructional Development uses elements of a comprehensive planning program in working with faculty and administrators to improve teaching and learning. Its organization, development process, and impact are discussed. (LBH)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Educational Planning, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gray, Peter J.; Diamond, Robert M. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1989
The evaluation and research unit of the Syracuse University Center for Instructional Development is described. The center provides information relative to courses, curricula, academic and nonacademic programs, academic and nonacademic administrative concerns, and institutional issues. The development of a new teaching assistant orientation program…
Descriptors: College Administration, Courses, Curriculum Development, Educational Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Diamond, Robert M. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1993
The faculty reward system on each college campus must be compatible with its central mission. Faculty and administration can and should work together to reform personnel practices from teacher training through appointment, promotion, tenure, and merit pay decisions. Respect for individual differences and the complexity of constituencies is…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Educational Change, Employment Practices, Faculty College Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Diamond, Robert M. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1993
It is argued that modification to a college's promotion and tenure system requires commitment and participation by both faculty and administration. The roles of the president, administration, and committees are examined, a four-step process of change is outlined, and specific issues to address in creating a climate for change are enumerated. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Change Strategies, College Faculty, College Presidents