Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Data Analysis | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| National Competency Tests | 3 |
| Student Evaluation | 3 |
| Educational Assessment | 2 |
| Mathematics Achievement | 2 |
| Research Methodology | 2 |
| Test Content | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Haertel, Edward H. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 12 | 2 |
| Grade 4 | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 3 results
Download full textNational Assessment Governing Board, 2010
Since 1973, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has gathered information about student achievement in mathematics. Results of these periodic assessments, produced in print and web-based formats, provide valuable information to a wide variety of audiences. The NAEP Assessment in mathematics has two components that differ in…
Descriptors: Mathematics Achievement, Academic Achievement, Audiences, National Competency Tests
National Assessment Governing Board, 2008
An assessment framework is like a blueprint, laying out the basic design of the assessment by describing the mathematics content that should be tested and the types of assessment questions that should be included. It also describes how the various design factors should be balanced across the assessment. This is an assessment framework, not a…
Descriptors: Test Items, Student Evaluation, National Competency Tests, Data Analysis
Haertel, Edward H. – National Assessment Governing Board, 2003
The paper initially describes the sources of uncertainty in National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data and standard errors. As NAEP sample sizes have increased, greater precision has been attained by the program. For this reason, exclusion effects are increasingly important. Two scenarios of revised NAEP results are presented (for New…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Computation, Disabilities, Limited English Speaking
