NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing 1 to 15 of 184 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Miller, Patrick C.; Grobe, William J. – NASSP Bulletin, 2013
The Collaborative Project (CP) began as a pilot project in five North Carolina school districts in 2007 featuring a performance incentive initiative for teachers and administrators. The objective of this study was to document principals' perceptions of the performance incentive initiative to determine challenges encountered during implementation.…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Pilot Projects, Principals, Public Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Range, Bret G.; Duncan, Heather E.; Scherz, Susan Day; Haines, Courtney A. – NASSP Bulletin, 2012
This study explored Wyoming school leaders' perceptions about the traits of incompetent teachers, strategies used to work with incompetent teachers, and the barriers to their dismissal. Most importantly, this study differentiated how principals and superintendents viewed incompetency issues. Some major findings include school leaders' beliefs that…
Descriptors: Unions, Career Change, Classroom Techniques, Teacher Competencies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scherrer, Jimmy – NASSP Bulletin, 2011
The use of value-added modeling (VAM) in school accountability is expanding. However, trying to decide how to embrace VAM can be rather nettlesome. Some experts claim it is "too unreliable," causes "more harm than good," and has "a big margin for error," while other experts assert VAM is "imperfect, but useful" and provides "valuable feedback."…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Accountability, Inferences, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Matula, Joseph J. – NASSP Bulletin, 2011
Over the past 10 years, since No Child Left Behind started pressuring school districts to focus on student test scores, many states have begun to consider student performance when evaluating teachers. This article will provide preventive measures of fairness and substantive due process to avoid potential teacher objections and gain teacher…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Teacher Evaluation, Federal Legislation, Legal Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Attinello, Jacqueline R.; Lare, Douglas; Waters, Faith – NASSP Bulletin, 2006
The demands placed on principals in the era of No Child Left Behind are rapidly increasing. In light of these challenges, balancing diverse roles and additional responsibilities can be arduous for even the finest school leaders. The use of portfolio-based teacher appraisals has emerged as an intriguing option to make the time required for teacher…
Descriptors: Professional Development, Principals, Administrator Responsibility, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peterson, Kenneth – NASSP Bulletin, 2004
Research literature highlights the principal as central to teacher evaluation. However, principal reports do not provide adequate information to document teacher quality. Good teacher evaluation adds multiple data sources such as client surveys, peer reviews of materials, and pupil achievement data, which vary by teacher and setting. Principals…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Principals, Teacher Effectiveness, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zimmerman, Sherri; Deckert-Pelton, Melanie – NASSP Bulletin, 2003
Surveys 86 teachers from five Florida counties to determine their perceptions of their principals' effectiveness as evaluators. Finds four areas teachers consider essential for effective teacher evaluation: Principal initiated interaction with teachers, consistent evaluation process, principal commitment to effective evaluations, and principal…
Descriptors: Administrator Effectiveness, Elementary Secondary Education, Teacher Attitudes, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kaplan, Leslie S.; Owings, William A. – NASSP Bulletin, 2002
The academic and political arguments about teacher quality affect how secondary principals do their jobs. Educational research provides useful guidance about which teacher candidates may be most likely to increase student achievement, but it must be used critically and cautiously. When individuals with varying political agendas interpret the same…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Educational Research, Federal Legislation, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wallinger, Linda M. – NASSP Bulletin, 2000
Observing administrators should watch and listen to both teachers and students, noting use of the target language by both groups, prevalence of student-centered activities, instructional strategies that encourage language learning and accommodate varied learning styles, well-integrated lesson plans, and presence of a comfortable classroom climate.…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Check Lists, Classroom Environment, Classroom Observation Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sullivan, Kathleen A.; Zirkel, Perry A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1999
A comprehensive written documentation system for teacher evaluation usually includes classroom observations, assessment documents, principal's log, specific incident reports, and summary memoranda. Principals should be specific, involve others, be timely, treat all employees alike, state facts and conclusions, and use negative language where…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Documentation, Elementary Secondary Education, Observation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Coutts, J. Douglas – NASSP Bulletin, 1999
Administrators' classroom observations should be supplemented by more thorough evaluation techniques. This article describes a simple device for measuring teachers' progress toward completing instructional goals based on electronically submitted lesson plans. Repeated low "turn" rates may signify the need for extra classroom resources or problems…
Descriptors: Computer Managed Instruction, Educational Objectives, Ethics, Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zederayko, Glenn E.; Ward, Kelly – NASSP Bulletin, 1999
Teachers cannot be members of learning communities without time for regular reflection, research, collaboration, and innovation. A private academy developed a formalized learning process dividing faculty into three groups. Each undergoes an evaluation year, a learning development year (with reduced teaching load), and a consolidation/practice…
Descriptors: Educational Benefits, Faculty Development, Faculty Workload, High Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedman, Stephen J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1998
Proposes guidelines for principals attempting to evaluate teachers' grading policies. Principals should understand teachers' perspectives, ask for copies of their grading policies, be wary of traits (like "effort") not measuring achievement, consider grading information quality, think about homework's role, expect teachers to use numbers and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Responsibility, Evaluation Criteria, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Onderdonk, James C.; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1996
A Virginia school system independently arrived at and implemented some recommendations from NASSP's 1996 report "Breaking Ranks." In 1994, Old Dominion University and the Norfolk Public Schools embarked on a decade-long major school reform initiative (PRIME) aimed at providing students with exemplary college and career opportunities and teachers…
Descriptors: College School Cooperation, Elementary Secondary Education, Internship Programs, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marks, Merle B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
It is now recognized that there are almost as many learning styles as there are learners. Today's teacher is faced with the difficult task of developing a multidimensional system to evaluate his teaching effectiveness. (Editor)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Diagrams, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13