Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Attitude Measures | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| Educational Legislation | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Measurement:… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Intermediate Grades | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 2 results
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWyse, Adam E. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
Construct maps are tools that display how the underlying achievement construct upon which one is trying to set cut-scores is related to other information used in the process of standard setting. This article reviews what construct maps are, uses construct maps to provide a conceptual framework to view commonly used standard-setting procedures (the…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Cutting Scores, Methods
Popham, W. James; Keller, Tom; Moulding, Brett; Pellegrino, James; Sandifer, Paul – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2005
Instructionally supportive accountability tests (a) measure students' mastery of only a modest number of extraordinarily important curricular aims; (b) describe what is to be assessed in clear, teacher-palatable language; and (c) report each student's results for every curricular aim assessed. To determine the suitability of such assessments to…
Descriptors: Science Tests, Physical Sciences, Accountability, Educational Legislation
