Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
| Measurement:… | 3 |
Author
| Popham, W. James | 3 |
| Keller, Tom | 2 |
| Moulding, Brett | 2 |
| Pellegrino, James | 2 |
| Sandifer, Paul | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 3 results
Popham, W. James – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The author recalls that as a child, he grooved on teeter-totters. Also known as a seesaw, a teeter-totter is a long, narrow board that's elevated with a pivot point in the middle so that as one end goes down the other end goes up. When going up or going down, sometimes quite rapidly, teeter-totters can provide their two riders with some…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Performance, Standards
Popham, W. James; Keller, Tom; Moulding, Brett; Pellegrino, James; Sandifer, Paul – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2005
Instructionally supportive accountability tests (a) measure students' mastery of only a modest number of extraordinarily important curricular aims; (b) describe what is to be assessed in clear, teacher-palatable language; and (c) report each student's results for every curricular aim assessed. To determine the suitability of such assessments to…
Descriptors: Science Tests, Physical Sciences, Accountability, Educational Legislation
Popham, W. James; Keller, Tom; Moulding, Brett; Pellegrino, James; Sandifer, Paul – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2005
This article presents a rejoinder to the commentaries on the authors' article titled, "Instructionally Supportive Accountability Tests in Science: A Viable Assessment Option?" The commentaries offer a series of well warranted cautions regarding the adoption of any form of large-scale accountability testing. However, the authors contend that,…
Descriptors: Accountability, Science Instruction, Student Evaluation, High Stakes Tests

Peer reviewed
Direct link
