Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Equated Scores | 4 |
| Methods | 3 |
| Regression (Statistics) | 3 |
| Test Items | 3 |
| Differences | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Statistical Bias | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Measurement:… | 4 |
Author
| Kane, Michael T. | 4 |
| Mroch, Andrew A. | 4 |
| Ripkey, Douglas R. | 4 |
| Suh, Youngsuk | 4 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 4 results
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKane, Michael T.; Mroch, Andrew A.; Suh, Youngsuk; Ripkey, Douglas R. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2010
This article presents the authors' rejoinder to commentaries on linear equating and the NEAT design. The authors appreciate the insightful work of the commentary writers. Each has made a number of interesting points, many of which the authors had not considered at all. Before responding to some of those points, the authors reiterate what they see…
Descriptors: Weighted Scores, Equated Scores, Models, Scores
Mroch, Andrew A.; Suh, Youngsuk; Kane, Michael T.; Ripkey, Douglas R. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2009
This study uses the results of two previous papers (Kane, Mroch, Suh, & Ripkey, this issue; Suh, Mroch, Kane, & Ripkey, this issue) and the literature on linear equating to evaluate five linear equating methods along several dimensions, including the plausibility of their assumptions and their levels of bias and root mean squared difference…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Methods, Test Items, Differences
Suh, Youngsuk; Mroch, Andrew A.; Kane, Michael T.; Ripkey, Douglas R. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2009
In this study, a data base containing the responses of 40,000 candidates to 90 multiple-choice questions was used to mimic data sets for 50-item tests under the "nonequivalent groups with anchor test" (NEAT) design. Using these smaller data sets, we evaluated the performance of five linear equating methods for the NEAT design with five levels of…
Descriptors: Test Items, Equated Scores, Methods, Differences
Kane, Michael T.; Mroch, Andrew A.; Suh, Youngsuk; Ripkey, Douglas R. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2009
This paper analyzes five linear equating models for the "nonequivalent groups with anchor test" (NEAT) design with internal anchors (i.e., the anchor test is part of the full test). The analysis employs a two-dimensional framework. The first dimension contrasts two general approaches to developing the equating relationship. Under a "parameter…
Descriptors: Scaling, Equated Scores, Methods, Test Items
