Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 3 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 6 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
| Animals | 6 |
| Reinforcement | 4 |
| Stimuli | 4 |
| Experiments | 2 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 2 |
| Memory | 2 |
| Predictor Variables | 2 |
| Probability | 2 |
| Responses | 2 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Learning and Motivation | 6 |
Author
| Zentall, Thomas R. | 6 |
| Stagner, Jessica P. | 2 |
| Bardo, Michael T. | 1 |
| DiGian, Kelly A. | 1 |
| Gehrke, Brenda J. | 1 |
| Gipson, Cassandra D. | 1 |
| Green, Thomas A. | 1 |
| Klein, Emily D. | 1 |
| Laude, Jennifer R. | 1 |
| Miller, Holly C. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 6 results
Singer, Rebecca A.; Zentall, Thomas R. – Learning and Motivation, 2011
Pigeons prefer a positive discriminative (S+) stimulus that follows a less preferred event (a large number of required responses, a longer delay, or the absence of food) over a different S+ with a similar history of reinforcement that follows a more preferred event (a single required response, no delay, or food). We proposed that this phenomenon…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Experiments, Animals, Stimuli
Zentall, Thomas R.; Stagner, Jessica P. – Learning and Motivation, 2011
Pigeons show a preference for an alternative that provides them with discriminative stimuli (sometimes a stimulus that predicts reinforcement and at other times a stimulus that predicts the absence of reinforcement) over an alternative that provides them with nondiscriminative stimuli, even if the nondiscriminative stimulus alternative is…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Behavior, Reinforcement, Probability
Stagner, Jessica P.; Laude, Jennifer R.; Zentall, Thomas R. – Learning and Motivation, 2011
When pigeons are given a choice between two alternatives, one leading to a stimulus 20% of the time that always signals reinforcement (S+) or another stimulus 80% of the time that signals no reinforcement (S-), and the other alternative leading to one of two stimuli each signaling reinforcement 50% of the time, they show a strong preference for…
Descriptors: Animals, Reinforcement, Probability, Stimuli
Zentall, Thomas R. – Learning and Motivation, 2010
When animals code stimuli for later retrieval they can either code them in terms of the stimulus presented (as a retrospective memory) or in terms of the response or outcome anticipated (as a prospective memory). Although retrospective memory is typically assumed (as in the form of a memory trace), evidence of prospective coding has been found…
Descriptors: Animals, Planning, Futures (of Society), Stimuli
Gipson, Cassandra D.; DiGian, Kelly A.; Miller, Holly C.; Zentall, Thomas R. – Learning and Motivation, 2008
Previous research with the radial maze has found evidence that rats can remember both places that they have already been (retrospective coding) and places they have yet to visit (prospective coding; Cook, R. G., Brown, M. F., & Riley, D. A. (1985). Flexible memory processing by rats: Use of prospective and retrospective information in the radial…
Descriptors: Animals, Logical Thinking, Experimental Psychology, Memory
Klein, Emily D.; Gehrke, Brenda J.; Green, Thomas A.; Zentall, Thomas R.; Bardo, Michael T. – Learning and Motivation, 2007
The purpose of the present experiment was to determine whether repeated cocaine exposure differentially affects sucrose-reinforced operant responding in rats raised in an enriched condition (EC) or an isolated condition (IC). Specifically, the performance of EC and IC rats pressing a lever for sucrose under a high fixed-ratio schedule (FR 30)…
Descriptors: Cues, Cocaine, Reinforcement, Operant Conditioning

Peer reviewed
Direct link
